Reconsidering Power, Interests and Actor Relations in Labour Studies: The Case of the Privatisation in the Port of Hamburg

This article proposes an extension of the Power Resource Approach (PRA) that systematically addresses central criticisms of the original framework. We argue that a comprehensive understanding of labour conflicts in capitalist societies necessitates at least three conceptual elaborations: (1) a relational perspective on labour conflicts and power dynamics; (2) an emphasis on the heterogeneity of (collective) interests and orientations that both enable and constrain collective action; and (3) a reconceptualisation of employers as active counterparts in labour relations, equipped with their own interests, orientations, and power resources. Particular attention is paid to bargaining processes between antagonistic actor groups and to the often contradictory interests and normative orientations that shape action and inform the mobilisation of power resources. This actor-centred perspective aims to contribute to a more differentiated and empirically grounded understanding of labour relations. The analytical potential of the extended framework is illustrated through the empirical case of resistance to port privatisation in Hamburg, Germany.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Labour Journal
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v16i3.5983
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering Power, Interests and Actor Relations in Labour Studies: The Case of the Privatisation in the Port of Hamburg

1 citations
Global Labour Journal
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
1.72
article

Reconsidering Power, Interests and Actor Relations in Labour Studies: The Case of the Privatisation in the Port of Hamburg

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article proposes an extension of the Power Resource Approach (PRA) that systematically addresses central criticisms of the original framework. We argue that a comprehensive understanding of labour conflicts in capitalist societies necessitates at least three conceptual elaborations: (1) a relational perspective on labour conflicts and power dynamics; (2) an emphasis on the heterogeneity of (collective) interests and orientations that both enable and constrain collective action; and (3) a reconceptualisation of employers as active counterparts in labour relations, equipped with their own interests, orientations, and power resources. Particular attention is paid to bargaining processes between antagonistic actor groups and to the often contradictory interests and normative orientations that shape action and inform the mobilisation of power resources. This actor-centred perspective aims to contribute to a more differentiated and empirically grounded understanding of labour relations. The analytical potential of the extended framework is illustrated through the empirical case of resistance to port privatisation in Hamburg, Germany.

Global Labour JournalVol. 16(3)
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.