Exploring the Use of Skin Staples for Bowel Anastomosis: A Scoping Review

Background: Intestinal staplers have revolutionized gastrointestinal surgery by facilitating faster bowel anastomoses, achieving outcomes comparable to hand-sewn techniques. However, their high cost restricts routine use in resource-limited settings, leading to increased interest in using skin staples for bowel anastomoses. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the use of skin staples for this purpose. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of databases using the search terms “skin staples” and “bowel anastomoses.” Studies that focused on the use of skin staples for bowel anastomoses were included, while abstracts, animal studies, and conference papers were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool. Results: Two non-randomized studies involving 115 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of cases involved small bowel-to-small bowel anastomoses (74.8%), with cancer being the primary indication (80%). Postoperative complications included two cases of pelvic collections and one case of intestinal obstruction, all of which were managed non-operatively. No anastomotic leaks were reported. The risk of bias was moderate due to unclear patient selection processes. Conclusion: While the use of skin staples for bowel anastomoses appears to be safe, with no reported anastomotic leaks and minimal complications in the included studies, it is important to note the small sample sizes of these studies. This highlights the need for further multicenter randomized controlled trials to validate these findings and compare outcomes with conventional staplers and hand-sewn methods. The potential of skin staples as a viable alternative in resource-limited settings is promising; however, further research is necessary to confirm this.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30476/acrr.2025.106368.1243
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Use of Skin Staples for Bowel Anastomosis: A Scoping Review

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Exploring the Use of Skin Staples for Bowel Anastomosis: A Scoping Review

article en

Abstract

Background: Intestinal staplers have revolutionized gastrointestinal surgery by facilitating faster bowel anastomoses, achieving outcomes comparable to hand-sewn techniques. However, their high cost restricts routine use in resource-limited settings, leading to increased interest in using skin staples for bowel anastomoses. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the use of skin staples for this purpose. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of databases using the search terms “skin staples” and “bowel anastomoses.” Studies that focused on the use of skin staples for bowel anastomoses were included, while abstracts, animal studies, and conference papers were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-I tool. Results: Two non-randomized studies involving 115 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of cases involved small bowel-to-small bowel anastomoses (74.8%), with cancer being the primary indication (80%). Postoperative complications included two cases of pelvic collections and one case of intestinal obstruction, all of which were managed non-operatively. No anastomotic leaks were reported. The risk of bias was moderate due to unclear patient selection processes. Conclusion: While the use of skin staples for bowel anastomoses appears to be safe, with no reported anastomotic leaks and minimal complications in the included studies, it is important to note the small sample sizes of these studies. This highlights the need for further multicenter randomized controlled trials to validate these findings and compare outcomes with conventional staplers and hand-sewn methods. The potential of skin staples as a viable alternative in resource-limited settings is promising; however, further research is necessary to confirm this.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Afe Babalola University (NG), University of Maiduguri (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.