Optimal Pricing of Product Considering Consumer Regret Psychology

This paper investigates the application of skimming pricing in sales strategies for businesses, considering the influence of regret psychology on consumer decision-making. It introduces two types of regret psychology-high-price regret and out-of-stock regret-into the consumer utility function, developing a two-stage consumer decision-making model. The paper then addresses optimal pricing and profit strategies for dynamic pricing and commitment pricing approaches. Additionally, it compares and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these models. Finally, it examines how high-price regret and out-of-stock regret affect optimal profits. The study suggests that dynamic pricing is optimal when consumers are more sensitive to high-price regret, while commitment pricing is preferable for maximizing profits when consumers are more sensitive to out-of-stock regret. Moreover, it finds that the lower the consumer high-price regret coefficient, the higher the optimal profit for enterprises. For businesses selling “continuous demand” commodities, optimal profit increases with consumer out-of-stock regret coefficient, whereas for businesses selling “fault-line demand” commodities, optimal profit decreases with this coefficient. This research can provide a theoretical model for AI to analyze consumer behavior while considering consumer regret psychology, and then help enterprises to provide decision support for product pricing and revenue management.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/smc54092.2024.11169737
Primary Topic
Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Pricing of Product Considering Consumer Regret Psychology

Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
article

Optimal Pricing of Product Considering Consumer Regret Psychology

article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of skimming pricing in sales strategies for businesses, considering the influence of regret psychology on consumer decision-making. It introduces two types of regret psychology-high-price regret and out-of-stock regret-into the consumer utility function, developing a two-stage consumer decision-making model. The paper then addresses optimal pricing and profit strategies for dynamic pricing and commitment pricing approaches. Additionally, it compares and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these models. Finally, it examines how high-price regret and out-of-stock regret affect optimal profits. The study suggests that dynamic pricing is optimal when consumers are more sensitive to high-price regret, while commitment pricing is preferable for maximizing profits when consumers are more sensitive to out-of-stock regret. Moreover, it finds that the lower the consumer high-price regret coefficient, the higher the optimal profit for enterprises. For businesses selling “continuous demand” commodities, optimal profit increases with consumer out-of-stock regret coefficient, whereas for businesses selling “fault-line demand” commodities, optimal profit decreases with this coefficient. This research can provide a theoretical model for AI to analyze consumer behavior while considering consumer regret psychology, and then help enterprises to provide decision support for product pricing and revenue management.

Monmouth University (US), Liaoning Shihua University (CN), Henan University (CN), Rowan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.