(Nie)oczywiste przesłanki nabycia prawa do odprawy emerytalnej (rentowej) w świetle orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego

The article undertakes an analysis of retirement and disability severance pay as a common benefit available to employees in connection with the termination of their professional activity. This severance pay, regulated by Article 921 of the Labor Code, is a one‑time benefit of a social nature, aimed at facilitating the employee’s adaptation to a new life situation. The article discusses the historical legal background of the severance payment, its evolution and various interpretations of the current legislation, including the issue of the one‑time nature of the benefit and the possibility of its reacquisition in the event of reemployment. Particular attention was paid to the analysis of the case law of the Supreme Court, whose statements often leave a significant deficiency in the arguments presented.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej
Published
2025-09-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4467/25444654spp.25.027.22031
Primary Topic
Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Nie)oczywiste przesłanki nabycia prawa do odprawy emerytalnej (rentowej) w świetle orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego

Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Społecznej
Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
article

(Nie)oczywiste przesłanki nabycia prawa do odprawy emerytalnej (rentowej) w świetle orzecznictwa Sądu Najwyższego

article en

Abstract

The article undertakes an analysis of retirement and disability severance pay as a common benefit available to employees in connection with the termination of their professional activity. This severance pay, regulated by Article 921 of the Labor Code, is a one‑time benefit of a social nature, aimed at facilitating the employee’s adaptation to a new life situation. The article discusses the historical legal background of the severance payment, its evolution and various interpretations of the current legislation, including the issue of the one‑time nature of the benefit and the possibility of its reacquisition in the event of reemployment. Particular attention was paid to the analysis of the case law of the Supreme Court, whose statements often leave a significant deficiency in the arguments presented.

Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki SpołecznejVol. 32(4)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.