Healthcare professionals’ awareness of and barriers to shared-clinical-decision-making for HPV vaccination among adults 27–45 years

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for inadequately vaccinated adults aged 27–45 based on shared clinical decision-making (SCDM). However, little is known about awareness and barriers to SCDM among US healthcare providers (HCPs), especially in Texas, where HPV vaccination rates are below the national average. Between January and April 2021, we conducted a population-based cross-sectional survey (12% response rate) of HCPs licensed in Texas to assess the prevalence and factors associated with awareness of the SCDM recommendation. HCPs were asked if they were aware and if they foresaw any barriers in implementing SCDM for HPV vaccine recommendation. Among the 1,279 respondents, 54.26% were aware of this recommendation. HCPs practicing as gynecologists/obstetricians (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 6.12; 95%CI: 2.60–14.40, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), those working in Federally Qualified Health Centers (aOR: 2.13, 95%CI: 1.24–3.65, <i>p</i> = .006) or group practices (aOR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.22–2.30, <i>p</i> = .001), those seeing <b>≤</b> 100 patients/week (aOR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.15–2.51, <i>p</i> = .008), those who had received formal training on HPV vaccination promotion and counseling within the past two years (aOR: 3.42, 95%CI: 2.29–5.10, <i>p</i> = &lt; 0.001), between two and five years ago (aOR: 2.35, 95%CI: 1.67–3.30, <i>p</i> = &lt; 0.001), and more than five years ago (aOR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.16–2.50, <i>p</i> = .006) had significantly higher odds of awareness of SCDM recommendation. HCPs practicing as nurse practitioners/advanced nurse practitioners (aOR: 0.56; 95%CI: 0.38–0.82, <i>p</i> = .003), physician assistants (aOR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.41–0.94, <i>p</i> = .023), aged 55 years or older (aOR: 0.57; 95%CI: 0.32–0.99, <i>p</i> = .046), Asian (aOR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.43–0.81, <i>p</i> = .001) and non-Hispanic Black (aOR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.40–0.97, <i>p</i> = .037) had significantly lower odds of awareness of SCDM recommendation. Overall, 44.96% of HCPs anticipated no barriers and planned to engage in SCDM, while 18.32% cited time commitment as an anticipated barrier. Internists cited time commitment (39.13%) as an anticipated barrier more frequently than other specialties, while physician assistants were more frequently unclear about how to implement SCDM (12.36%). We found limited awareness of the SCDM recommendation guideline for HPV vaccination among Texas HCPs. Therefore, training HCPs to use decision aids to actively engage patients in the SCDM process could improve HPV vaccination rates among unvaccinated adults aged 27–45.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30161491
Primary Topic
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare professionals’ awareness of and barriers to shared-clinical-decision-making for HPV vaccination among adults 27–45 years

Figshare
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
article

Healthcare professionals’ awareness of and barriers to shared-clinical-decision-making for HPV vaccination among adults 27–45 years

article en

Abstract

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for inadequately vaccinated adults aged 27–45 based on shared clinical decision-making (SCDM). However, little is known about awareness and barriers to SCDM among US healthcare providers (HCPs), especially in Texas, where HPV vaccination rates are below the national average. Between January and April 2021, we conducted a population-based cross-sectional survey (12% response rate) of HCPs licensed in Texas to assess the prevalence and factors associated with awareness of the SCDM recommendation. HCPs were asked if they were aware and if they foresaw any barriers in implementing SCDM for HPV vaccine recommendation. Among the 1,279 respondents, 54.26% were aware of this recommendation. HCPs practicing as gynecologists/obstetricians (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 6.12; 95%CI: 2.60–14.40, <i>p</i> &lt; .001), those working in Federally Qualified Health Centers (aOR: 2.13, 95%CI: 1.24–3.65, <i>p</i> = .006) or group practices (aOR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.22–2.30, <i>p</i> = .001), those seeing <b>≤</b> 100 patients/week (aOR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.15–2.51, <i>p</i> = .008), those who had received formal training on HPV vaccination promotion and counseling within the past two years (aOR: 3.42, 95%CI: 2.29–5.10, <i>p</i> = &lt; 0.001), between two and five years ago (aOR: 2.35, 95%CI: 1.67–3.30, <i>p</i> = &lt; 0.001), and more than five years ago (aOR: 1.70, 95%CI: 1.16–2.50, <i>p</i> = .006) had significantly higher odds of awareness of SCDM recommendation. HCPs practicing as nurse practitioners/advanced nurse practitioners (aOR: 0.56; 95%CI: 0.38–0.82, <i>p</i> = .003), physician assistants (aOR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.41–0.94, <i>p</i> = .023), aged 55 years or older (aOR: 0.57; 95%CI: 0.32–0.99, <i>p</i> = .046), Asian (aOR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.43–0.81, <i>p</i> = .001) and non-Hispanic Black (aOR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.40–0.97, <i>p</i> = .037) had significantly lower odds of awareness of SCDM recommendation. Overall, 44.96% of HCPs anticipated no barriers and planned to engage in SCDM, while 18.32% cited time commitment as an anticipated barrier. Internists cited time commitment (39.13%) as an anticipated barrier more frequently than other specialties, while physician assistants were more frequently unclear about how to implement SCDM (12.36%). We found limited awareness of the SCDM recommendation guideline for HPV vaccination among Texas HCPs. Therefore, training HCPs to use decision aids to actively engage patients in the SCDM process could improve HPV vaccination rates among unvaccinated adults aged 27–45.

Figshare
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.