A Review of the Characteristics of Recycled Aggregates and the Mechanical Properties of Concrete Produced by Replacing Natural Coarse Aggregates with Recycled Ones—Fostering Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructures

The construction industry is responsible for 50% of mineral resource extraction and 35% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this context, concrete stands out as one of the most consumed materials in the world. More than 30 billion tons of this material are produced annually, resulting in the extraction of around 19.4 billion tons of aggregates (mainly sand and gravel) per year. Therefore, it is urgent to develop strategies that aim to minimize the environmental impacts arising from this production chain. Currently, one of the most widely adopted solutions is the production of concrete through the reuse of construction and demolition waste. Thus, the objective of this research is to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on the use of recycled aggregates in concrete production, aiming to increase urban resilience by reducing the consumption of natural aggregates. An extensive search was performed in one of the most respected scientific databases (Scopus), and after a careful selection process, the main articles related to the topic were considered eligible through the PRISMA protocol. The selected manuscripts were then subjected to bibliographic and bibliometric analyses, allowing us to reach the state-of-the-art on the subject. The results obtained on the replacement rates of natural aggregate by recycled aggregate indicate that the recommendations vary from 20 to 60%, and these rates may be higher as long as the recycled aggregate is characterized, and may reach up to 100% as long as the matric concrete has a minimum compressive strength of 60 MPa. The specific gravity of most recycled aggregates ranges from 1.91 to 2.70, maintaining an average density of 2.32 g/cm3. Residual mortar adhered to recycled aggregates ranges from 20 to 56%. The water absorption process of recycled aggregate can vary from 2 to 15%. The mechanical strength of mixtures with recycled aggregates is significantly reduced due to the amount of mortar adhered to the aggregates. The use of recycled aggregates results in a compressive strength approximately 2.6 to 43% lower than that of concrete with natural aggregates, depending on the replacement rate. The same behavior was identified in relation to tensile strength. The modulus of elasticity showed a reduction of 25%, and the flexural strength was reduced by up to 15%.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infrastructures
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures10080213
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Review of the Characteristics of Recycled Aggregates and the Mechanical Properties of Concrete Produced by Replacing Natural Coarse Aggregates with Recycled Ones—Fostering Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructures

8 citations
Infrastructures
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
8.05
article

A Review of the Characteristics of Recycled Aggregates and the Mechanical Properties of Concrete Produced by Replacing Natural Coarse Aggregates with Recycled Ones—Fostering Resilient and Sustainable Infrastructures

article en
8 citations

Abstract

The construction industry is responsible for 50% of mineral resource extraction and 35% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this context, concrete stands out as one of the most consumed materials in the world. More than 30 billion tons of this material are produced annually, resulting in the extraction of around 19.4 billion tons of aggregates (mainly sand and gravel) per year. Therefore, it is urgent to develop strategies that aim to minimize the environmental impacts arising from this production chain. Currently, one of the most widely adopted solutions is the production of concrete through the reuse of construction and demolition waste. Thus, the objective of this research is to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) on the use of recycled aggregates in concrete production, aiming to increase urban resilience by reducing the consumption of natural aggregates. An extensive search was performed in one of the most respected scientific databases (Scopus), and after a careful selection process, the main articles related to the topic were considered eligible through the PRISMA protocol. The selected manuscripts were then subjected to bibliographic and bibliometric analyses, allowing us to reach the state-of-the-art on the subject. The results obtained on the replacement rates of natural aggregate by recycled aggregate indicate that the recommendations vary from 20 to 60%, and these rates may be higher as long as the recycled aggregate is characterized, and may reach up to 100% as long as the matric concrete has a minimum compressive strength of 60 MPa. The specific gravity of most recycled aggregates ranges from 1.91 to 2.70, maintaining an average density of 2.32 g/cm3. Residual mortar adhered to recycled aggregates ranges from 20 to 56%. The water absorption process of recycled aggregate can vary from 2 to 15%. The mechanical strength of mixtures with recycled aggregates is significantly reduced due to the amount of mortar adhered to the aggregates. The use of recycled aggregates results in a compressive strength approximately 2.6 to 43% lower than that of concrete with natural aggregates, depending on the replacement rate. The same behavior was identified in relation to tensile strength. The modulus of elasticity showed a reduction of 25%, and the flexural strength was reduced by up to 15%.

InfrastructuresVol. 10(8)
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Instituto Federal Fluminense (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
8.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.