Gender Differences in Coping Strategies: An Empirical Psychology Study of Working Professionals in Ranchi District

The present study explores gender differences in coping strategies and psychological distress among working professionals in Ranchi district, with a focus on the role of stigma perception and social support. A sample of 197 participants (103 males and 94 females) was randomly selected, representing diverse occupations and educational backgrounds. Data were collected through in-person and online interviews using standardized instruments including the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) and the Coping Strategies Inventory. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency, percentage) were calculated to profile demographic and psychological characteristics. Independent samples t-tests were conducted to compare coping strategies and distress levels between male and female participants, as well as between rural and urban groups. Findings revealed moderate levels of psychological distress across the sample, with females reporting slightly higher distress scores (M = 24.1) compared to males (M = 22.8), though the difference was not statistically significant (t(195) = -1.84, p = .067). Males demonstrated higher reliance on problem-focused and avoidant coping, whereas females employed more emotion-focused coping and sought greater social support. Rural professionals exhibited higher distress and stigma perception relative to their urban counterparts. These results suggest that coping behaviors are shaped by gendered social roles and contextual resources. The study highlights the need for gender-sensitive workplace interventions, stigma-reduction initiatives, and integration of social support systems into clinical psychology practice. Insights from this study may also inform stigma management strategies in public health programs such as tuberculosis (TB) care, where distress and adherence are critical.