Desiderata for a biomedical knowledge network: opportunities, challenges and future Directions

Knowledge graphs, collectively as a knowledge network, have become critical tools for knowledge discovery in computable and explainable knowledge systems. Due to the semantic and structural complexities of biomedical data, these knowledge graphs need to enable dynamic reasoning over large evolving graphs and support fit-for-purpose abstraction, while establishing standards, preserving provenance and enforcing policy constraints for actionable discovery. A recent meeting of leading scientists discussed the opportunities, challenges and future directions of a biomedical knowledge network. Here we present six desiderata inspired by the meeting: (1) inference and reasoning in biomedical knowledge graphs need domain-centric approaches; (2) harmonized and accessible standards are required for knowledge graph representation and metadata; (3) robust validation of biomedical knowledge graphs needs multi-layered, context-aware approaches that are both rigorous and scalable; (4) the evolving and synergistic relationship between knowledge graphs and large language models is essential in empowering AI-driven biomedical discovery; (5) integrated development environments, public repositories, and governance frameworks are essential for secure and reproducible knowledge graph sharing; and (6) robust validation, provenance, and ethical governance are critical for trustworthy biomedical knowledge graphs. Addressing these key issues will be essential to realize the promises of a biomedical knowledge network in advancing biomedicine.

Publication Details

Journal
ArXiv.org
Published
2025-09-26
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Desiderata for a biomedical knowledge network: opportunities, challenges and future Directions

ArXiv.org
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
article

Desiderata for a biomedical knowledge network: opportunities, challenges and future Directions

article en

Abstract

Knowledge graphs, collectively as a knowledge network, have become critical tools for knowledge discovery in computable and explainable knowledge systems. Due to the semantic and structural complexities of biomedical data, these knowledge graphs need to enable dynamic reasoning over large evolving graphs and support fit-for-purpose abstraction, while establishing standards, preserving provenance and enforcing policy constraints for actionable discovery. A recent meeting of leading scientists discussed the opportunities, challenges and future directions of a biomedical knowledge network. Here we present six desiderata inspired by the meeting: (1) inference and reasoning in biomedical knowledge graphs need domain-centric approaches; (2) harmonized and accessible standards are required for knowledge graph representation and metadata; (3) robust validation of biomedical knowledge graphs needs multi-layered, context-aware approaches that are both rigorous and scalable; (4) the evolving and synergistic relationship between knowledge graphs and large language models is essential in empowering AI-driven biomedical discovery; (5) integrated development environments, public repositories, and governance frameworks are essential for secure and reproducible knowledge graph sharing; and (6) robust validation, provenance, and ethical governance are critical for trustworthy biomedical knowledge graphs. Addressing these key issues will be essential to realize the promises of a biomedical knowledge network in advancing biomedicine.

ArXiv.org
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.