Hybrid Typologies: Quantifying the Operational Energy, Embodied Energy, and First Cost of Emergent Light-Wood-Framed Multifamily Construction Methods

In this paper, we propose using permit, bid, and construction documents from recently completed projects to develop four prototype buildings, each housing the same number of units of the same size and varying construction types and representing, respectively, garden apartments, wrap buildings, podium buildings, and conventional high-rise buildings. We propose comparatively evaluating these four types, the first and last of which represent conventional solutions while the middle two represent new hybrid solutions. Evaluation will be conducted for operational energy use using an hourly energy model, embodied energy of materials using a detailed three-dimensional structural model, and cost, using quantities from the previous models in concert with industry-standard cost estimation resources such as RSMeans.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/btes.3516
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Typologies: Quantifying the Operational Energy, Embodied Energy, and First Cost of Emergent Light-Wood-Framed Multifamily Construction Methods

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Hybrid Typologies: Quantifying the Operational Energy, Embodied Energy, and First Cost of Emergent Light-Wood-Framed Multifamily Construction Methods

article en

Abstract

In this paper, we propose using permit, bid, and construction documents from recently completed projects to develop four prototype buildings, each housing the same number of units of the same size and varying construction types and representing, respectively, garden apartments, wrap buildings, podium buildings, and conventional high-rise buildings. We propose comparatively evaluating these four types, the first and last of which represent conventional solutions while the middle two represent new hybrid solutions. Evaluation will be conducted for operational energy use using an hourly energy model, embodied energy of materials using a detailed three-dimensional structural model, and cost, using quantities from the previous models in concert with industry-standard cost estimation resources such as RSMeans.

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.