Holistic evaluation of formwork materials for low-carbon concrete

This paper presents a framework for quantifying and comparing the embodied carbon and labor involved in concrete formwork and casting through several lab-scale prototypes of shape-optimized concrete built using various form materials and digital fabrication methods. Formwork options include materials that fall under traditional practice, emerging practice, and organic formwork. Procedures combine casting experiments of an optimized beam design with an embodied carbon evaluation for both formwork and concrete, comparing the strengths and weaknesses of each material. By testing and documenting a range of formwork materials, this research attempts to develop a detailed understanding of the labor and carbon associated with formwork options. Formwork materials are qualitatively and quantitatively compared for their precision, accessibility, ease of construction, and embodied carbon. After analyzing formwork materials from this casting process, key materials will be selected to scale up for full-scale prototyping and stress testing. While the outcomes of this study are highly specific, a framework of quantifiable formwork material comparisons will guide future research into scalable and accessible methods for low-carbon construction.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/btes.3515
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holistic evaluation of formwork materials for low-carbon concrete

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
article

Holistic evaluation of formwork materials for low-carbon concrete

article en

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for quantifying and comparing the embodied carbon and labor involved in concrete formwork and casting through several lab-scale prototypes of shape-optimized concrete built using various form materials and digital fabrication methods. Formwork options include materials that fall under traditional practice, emerging practice, and organic formwork. Procedures combine casting experiments of an optimized beam design with an embodied carbon evaluation for both formwork and concrete, comparing the strengths and weaknesses of each material. By testing and documenting a range of formwork materials, this research attempts to develop a detailed understanding of the labor and carbon associated with formwork options. Formwork materials are qualitatively and quantitatively compared for their precision, accessibility, ease of construction, and embodied carbon. After analyzing formwork materials from this casting process, key materials will be selected to scale up for full-scale prototyping and stress testing. While the outcomes of this study are highly specific, a framework of quantifiable formwork material comparisons will guide future research into scalable and accessible methods for low-carbon construction.

University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst
University of Virginia (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Holistic evaluation of formwork materials for low-carbon concrete · University of Massachusetts (UMass) Amherst (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS