A comparative analysis of students' perceptions of online and hybrid learning models during the COVID-19 pandemic

This study presents a comparative analysis of two quantitative investigations into students' perceptions of online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. While both studies employed structured online surveys, each targeted distinct dimensions of digital learning: the first focused on general experiences with online education, whereas the second examined content delivery, assessment practices, and the potential of hybrid models. Findings reveal overlapping themes in digital accessibility, alongside divergent attitudes regarding instructional preferences and learning challenges. The comparative analysis offers practical implications for the refinement of digital education strategies and policy-making in post-pandemic academic environments.Background/purpose - COVID-19 had a significant impact on education, affecting not only educators' experiences but also students'. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a comparative analysis of two quantitative studies investigating students’ perceptions of online and hybrid learning during the pandemic. By examining the similarities and differences in students’ experiences—ranging from digital access and instructional preferences to emotional well-being and assessment practices—this study aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of how digital education strategies can be optimized in future learning environments.Materials/Methods - This comparative analysis is based on two independent quantitative studies that explored students’ perceptions of digital learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both studies utilized structured online questionnaires created in Google Forms and distributed among university-level students. Practical implications - In practice, educational institutions should prioritize the enhancement of digital literacy for both educators and students to ensure effective participation in online and hybrid learning environments. Additionally, universities must strengthen emotional and social support systems to address the isolation and disengagement frequently reported by students. Finally, there is a clear need for more flexible and student-centered assessment approaches that maintain academic rigor while reducing stress and accommodating diverse learning needs.Conclusion - This comparative analysis illustrates how student perceptions of online and hybrid learning during the COVID-19 pandemic reveal both shared challenges and differing preferences.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17230802
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of students' perceptions of online and hybrid learning models during the COVID-19 pandemic

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Malaria Research and Control
article

A comparative analysis of students' perceptions of online and hybrid learning models during the COVID-19 pandemic

article en

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of two quantitative investigations into students' perceptions of online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. While both studies employed structured online surveys, each targeted distinct dimensions of digital learning: the first focused on general experiences with online education, whereas the second examined content delivery, assessment practices, and the potential of hybrid models. Findings reveal overlapping themes in digital accessibility, alongside divergent attitudes regarding instructional preferences and learning challenges. The comparative analysis offers practical implications for the refinement of digital education strategies and policy-making in post-pandemic academic environments.Background/purpose - COVID-19 had a significant impact on education, affecting not only educators' experiences but also students'. The purpose of this paper is to conduct a comparative analysis of two quantitative studies investigating students’ perceptions of online and hybrid learning during the pandemic. By examining the similarities and differences in students’ experiences—ranging from digital access and instructional preferences to emotional well-being and assessment practices—this study aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of how digital education strategies can be optimized in future learning environments.Materials/Methods - This comparative analysis is based on two independent quantitative studies that explored students’ perceptions of digital learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both studies utilized structured online questionnaires created in Google Forms and distributed among university-level students. Practical implications - In practice, educational institutions should prioritize the enhancement of digital literacy for both educators and students to ensure effective participation in online and hybrid learning environments. Additionally, universities must strengthen emotional and social support systems to address the isolation and disengagement frequently reported by students. Finally, there is a clear need for more flexible and student-centered assessment approaches that maintain academic rigor while reducing stress and accommodating diverse learning needs.Conclusion - This comparative analysis illustrates how student perceptions of online and hybrid learning during the COVID-19 pandemic reveal both shared challenges and differing preferences.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
American University of Paris (FR), American University in the Emirates (AE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.