Smart hospitality: What drives consumers to accept AI services?

Purpose This study uncovers the determinants influencing consumers' intention to use (IU) AI-enabled services within the hospitality industry grounded on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). In addition to core constructs – performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), and facilitating conditions (FC) – the model incorporates trust (TR), hedonic motivation (HM), anthropomorphism (ATMP) and perceived risk (PR). It further examines personal innovativeness in IT (PIT) as a moderator. Design/methodology/approach Data collection was done, employing cross-sectional design, via Google Form link using convenience and snowball sampling techniques. The data was analysed using “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling” (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS 4.0. Findings The results reveal that PE, EE, SI, FC, TR, HM, and ATMP positively influence IU AI-enabled services, while PR has a negative effect. PIT significantly moderates the impact of PE and EE, with the model explaining 73.7% of the variance in usage intention. Research limitations/implications This study has substantial implications for hospitality businesses, AI developers, and policymakers. Understanding the factors driving AI usage allows stakeholders to design more effective implementation strategies and enhance consumer experience. Originality/value This study extends UTAUT by adding ATMP and HM and validates TR and PR in the usage of AI-enabled services within the Indian hospitality industry, a less explored area. It offers insights for designing user-friendly AI, promoting transparency, and addressing ethical and risk-related concerns in hospitality.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jhti-04-2025-0492
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smart hospitality: What drives consumers to accept AI services?

2 citations
Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
18.98
article

Smart hospitality: What drives consumers to accept AI services?

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study uncovers the determinants influencing consumers' intention to use (IU) AI-enabled services within the hospitality industry grounded on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). In addition to core constructs – performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), and facilitating conditions (FC) – the model incorporates trust (TR), hedonic motivation (HM), anthropomorphism (ATMP) and perceived risk (PR). It further examines personal innovativeness in IT (PIT) as a moderator. Design/methodology/approach Data collection was done, employing cross-sectional design, via Google Form link using convenience and snowball sampling techniques. The data was analysed using “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling” (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS 4.0. Findings The results reveal that PE, EE, SI, FC, TR, HM, and ATMP positively influence IU AI-enabled services, while PR has a negative effect. PIT significantly moderates the impact of PE and EE, with the model explaining 73.7% of the variance in usage intention. Research limitations/implications This study has substantial implications for hospitality businesses, AI developers, and policymakers. Understanding the factors driving AI usage allows stakeholders to design more effective implementation strategies and enhance consumer experience. Originality/value This study extends UTAUT by adding ATMP and HM and validates TR and PR in the usage of AI-enabled services within the Indian hospitality industry, a less explored area. It offers insights for designing user-friendly AI, promoting transparency, and addressing ethical and risk-related concerns in hospitality.

Journal of Hospitality and Tourism InsightsVol. 9(2)
Management Development Institute (IN), International Management Institute (IN), Aligarh Muslim University (IN), University of Tabuk (SA)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
18.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.