Stethorrhagus lupulus Simon 1896

Stethorrhagus lupulus Simon, 1896 Figs 1–2, 49 Stethorrhagus lupulus Simon, 1896: 422, ♀. Stethorrhagus lupulus – Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: 44, fig. 10a–g, ♂ ♀. Diagnosis Males of S. lupulus resemble those of S. oxossi, S. latoma and S. archangelus by the presence of a DTA and by the prolaterally inserted embolus (Fig. 3B–F; Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: figs 11a–b, 12a–c, 13ac). They differ from those of S. latoma and S. archangelus by the SePP shoulder-like, blunt, developed prolaterally (Fig. 1B–F; Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 10a) (SePP reduced to a small projection in S. latoma and S. archangelus – Fig. 5C–E; Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: figs 12a, 13a) and from those of S. oxossi by the DTA large and rounded; VL with an intermediate process between vVL and dVL (Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 10b) (DTA poorly developed, represented by a shallow excavation; intermedial process between vVL and dVL absent in S. oxossi – Fig. 3C–F, Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 11b). Females are similar to those of S. archangelus and S. oxossi by the presence of a VEP (Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: figs 11c, 12d). They differ from those of S. archangelus by the slit-shaped CO and by the invaginated VEP (Fig. 2C; Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 10f) (CO circular; VEP not invaginated in S. archangelus – Fig. 6C; Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 12d) and from those of S. oxossi by the V-shaped CO, with a clearly delimited anterior margin (Fig. 2C; Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 10f) (CO U-shaped, without a clearly delimited anterior margin in S. oxossi – Fig. 4C; Bonaldo & Brescovit 1994: fig. 11c). Type material Holotype BRAZIL • ♀; Amazonas, São Paulo de Olivença; Mathan leg.; MNHN 8131 (examined). Material examined (new records) BRAZIL – Acre • 1 ♂, 1 juv.; Rio Branco, Reserva Extrativista de Humaitá; [9°40′24″ S, 67°38′31″ W]; 12 Apr. 1996; Equipe IBSP/SMNK leg; IBSP 8724 • 1 ♂; Campus Embrapa Acre; 10°1′30.8″ S, 67°41′35.9″ W; Sep. 2012; L.M.S. Costa leg.; UFMG 12409 • 1 ♂; Senador Guiomard, Reserva Extrativista de Catuaba; [10°4′20″ S, 67°37′39″ W]; 2002; E.F. Morato leg.; IBSP 135237. – Amazonas • 1 ♂; Coari, Porto Urucu, Urucu River, artificial forest gap, border; 4°52′36.8″ S, 65°9′05″ W; 14 Jul. 2003; A.B. Bonaldo leg.; collected with beating tray; MPEG 39917 • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 4°49′33.9″ S, 65°1′50.6″ W; 18 Jul. 2003; MPEG 39918 • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding, medium regenerated forest gap; 4°50′01″ S, 65°1′53″ W; 3 Jul. 2006; D.F. Candiani leg.; MPEG 39921 • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding, highly regenerated clearing; 4°45′48″ S, 65°2′41″ W; 26 Sep. 2006; D.F. Candiani leg.; MPEG 39919 • 1 ♀; Coari, Urucu River basin, highly regenerated forest gap; 4°48′56″ S, 65°1′53″ W; 20 Jul. 2006; L.T. Miglio leg.; manual collection at night; MPEG 39920. – Mato Grosso • 1 ♀; Cotriguaçu, Fazenda São Nicolau; 9°50′24″ S, 58°14′54″ W; 2–14 Oct. 2010; A.J. Santos leg.; UFMG 7773 • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; UFMG 7792. – Pará • 1 ♀; Bagre, Igarapé Sequitã, Comunidade São Sebastião; 2°5′7.5″ S, 50°29′36.9″ W; 28 Jun. 2015; Josimar leg.; collected with beating tray; MPEG 39912. PERU – Loreto • 3 ♀♀; Cocha Shuinguito, Río Samiria; 5°8′ S, 74°45′ W; ca 100 m; May–Jun. 1990; T. Erwin et al. leg.; fogging; MUSM 0504401 • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; MUSM 0504404. – Madre de Dios • 1 ♀; Cuenca, Río Los Amigos, Centro de Investigación y Capacitación Río Los Amigos, CICRA; [12°34′27″ S, 70°4′3″ W]; 2 Mar. 2006; M. Deza leg.; UA 564 • 1 ♀; Tambopata, Trocha La Torre; 12°50′ S, 69°17′ W; 30 Jul. 1987; D. Silva leg.; MUSM 0504340. Description Male and female, see Bonaldo & Brescovit (1994: 44). Additional documentation in Figs 1–2. Distribution Venezuela, Colombia, Peru and Northern Brazil (Fig. 49). Remarks Bonaldo & Brescovit (1994) refer to the locality Ariquemes, Ji-Paraná River, as belonging to the state of Roraima (north of the state of Amazonas). In fact, it belongs to the state of Rondônia in Brazil (south of the state of Amazonas). This mistake is corrected on the map of Fig. 49.