Towards artificial intelligence‐assisted digital pathology: A systematic evaluation of multimodal generative artificial intelligence in clear cell renal cell carcinoma assessment

Abstract Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most common subtype of RCC, requires accurate pathological grading for effective prognosis. However, current grading methods rely heavily on subjective pathologist assessment, leading to variability. While generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has shown promise in medical imaging, its application in digital pathology remains underexplored. This study evaluates the performance of three multimodal GenAI models—GPT‐4o, Claude‐3.5‐Sonnet, and Gemini‐1.5‐Pro—in ccRCC grading and prognosis prediction. A total of 499 ccRCC slides from The Cancer Genome Atlas and 349 external samples from two independent cohorts were analyzed. A standardized prompt repetition mechanism and variance‐based stability validation method guided GenAI models in extracting 17 pathological features. Feature stability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). These features, combined with 3 clinical variables, were used to build grading and prognostic models via logistic regression and 113 machine learning algorithms. Performance was benchmarked against CellProfiler, ResNet‐50, DenseNet‐121, attention‐based multiple instance learning (MIL) and Pathology Language and Image Pre‐training, using the concordance index (C‐index) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Claude‐3.5‐Sonnet outperformed the other two GenAI models (ICC = 0.76; micro‐average AUC = 0.87), exceeding ResNet‐50 (AUC = 0.78) and attention‐based MIL (AUC = 0.70). Its top prognostic models achieved an average C‐index of 0.739, effectively stratifying high‐ and low‐risk patients. Key predictors included stage, calcification, sarcomatoid differentiation, and vascular networks. GenAI, particularly Claude‐3.5‐Sonnet, enhances accuracy and consistency in ccRCC pathology, showing strong potential for clinical use, especially in resource‐limited settings.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interdisciplinary medicine
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/inmd.70047
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards artificial intelligence‐assisted digital pathology: A systematic evaluation of multimodal generative artificial intelligence in clear cell renal cell carcinoma assessment

2 citations
Interdisciplinary medicine
Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
3.43
article

Towards artificial intelligence‐assisted digital pathology: A systematic evaluation of multimodal generative artificial intelligence in clear cell renal cell carcinoma assessment

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), the most common subtype of RCC, requires accurate pathological grading for effective prognosis. However, current grading methods rely heavily on subjective pathologist assessment, leading to variability. While generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has shown promise in medical imaging, its application in digital pathology remains underexplored. This study evaluates the performance of three multimodal GenAI models—GPT‐4o, Claude‐3.5‐Sonnet, and Gemini‐1.5‐Pro—in ccRCC grading and prognosis prediction. A total of 499 ccRCC slides from The Cancer Genome Atlas and 349 external samples from two independent cohorts were analyzed. A standardized prompt repetition mechanism and variance‐based stability validation method guided GenAI models in extracting 17 pathological features. Feature stability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). These features, combined with 3 clinical variables, were used to build grading and prognostic models via logistic regression and 113 machine learning algorithms. Performance was benchmarked against CellProfiler, ResNet‐50, DenseNet‐121, attention‐based multiple instance learning (MIL) and Pathology Language and Image Pre‐training, using the concordance index (C‐index) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Claude‐3.5‐Sonnet outperformed the other two GenAI models (ICC = 0.76; micro‐average AUC = 0.87), exceeding ResNet‐50 (AUC = 0.78) and attention‐based MIL (AUC = 0.70). Its top prognostic models achieved an average C‐index of 0.739, effectively stratifying high‐ and low‐risk patients. Key predictors included stage, calcification, sarcomatoid differentiation, and vascular networks. GenAI, particularly Claude‐3.5‐Sonnet, enhances accuracy and consistency in ccRCC pathology, showing strong potential for clinical use, especially in resource‐limited settings.

Interdisciplinary medicineVol. 3(5)
Qingdao University (CN), Central South University (CN), TU Wien (AT), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Second Military Medical University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Anhui Medical University (CN), University of Macau (MO), Fudan University (CN), XinHua Hospital (CN), Quzhou City People's Hospital (CN), Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Nanfang Hospital (CN), Zhuhai People's Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN), Zhujiang Hospital (CN), Quzhou University (CN), Suzhou Research Institute (CN), Zhongshan Hospital (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN), The First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang (CN), Shanghai First People's Hospital (CN), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (CN), Xiangya Hospital Central South University (CN), Monash University (AU), Southern Medical University (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK), South China University of Technology (CN)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.