When half a boycott makes a winner: On Eurovision voting
Boycotts are meant to isolate. A pushback—however small—is almost always inevitable. In settings with many alternatives, boycott tends to be diffuse, while counter-support is concentrated. This asymmetry can translate into a great advantage for the boycotted party. • In contests with many candidates, boycott is diffuse, counter support is concentrated. • Even weak pushback to boycott calls may yield an outsized advantage. • Neutrality may hinder controversial candidates more than boycott.
Institutions
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
- Barcelona School of Economics (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Economics Letters
- Published
- 2025-09-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112639
- Primary Topic
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación