Developing and Testing a Peer-Review Process for Content Quality Assurance in MOOCs: A Case Study on an E-Assessment Course. Presentation at ICL 2025 in Budapest.

This contribution presents the development and testing of a peer-review process for content quality assurance in MOOCs, implemented in the course “E-Assessment – auf Kurs gebracht”. The process was evaluated regarding complexity, duration, collaboration with external reviewers, and learners’ perception. Results show that the procedure can be smoothly integrated into MOOC development. Reviewers contributed beyond expectations by providing materials, didactic advice, and legal-ethical reflections. Learners rated the videos (very) positively (92.7% positive ratings, 100 participants, n=812 answers), especially for structure and coherence. Slightly lower ratings for 'visual appearance' and 'use of supportive linguistic elements' can be explained by the course’s retro video de-sign and the viewers’ understanding of how linguistic devices can be effectively used in educational videos. The study confirms peer review as a feasible and effective quality as-surance approach that supports both collaboration and content improvement.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3217/30phw-7ez31
Primary Topic
Library Science and Administration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing and Testing a Peer-Review Process for Content Quality Assurance in MOOCs: A Case Study on an E-Assessment Course. Presentation at ICL 2025 in Budapest.

TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
Library Science and Administration
article

Developing and Testing a Peer-Review Process for Content Quality Assurance in MOOCs: A Case Study on an E-Assessment Course. Presentation at ICL 2025 in Budapest.

article en

Abstract

This contribution presents the development and testing of a peer-review process for content quality assurance in MOOCs, implemented in the course “E-Assessment – auf Kurs gebracht”. The process was evaluated regarding complexity, duration, collaboration with external reviewers, and learners’ perception. Results show that the procedure can be smoothly integrated into MOOC development. Reviewers contributed beyond expectations by providing materials, didactic advice, and legal-ethical reflections. Learners rated the videos (very) positively (92.7% positive ratings, 100 participants, n=812 answers), especially for structure and coherence. Slightly lower ratings for 'visual appearance' and 'use of supportive linguistic elements' can be explained by the course’s retro video de-sign and the viewers’ understanding of how linguistic devices can be effectively used in educational videos. The study confirms peer review as a feasible and effective quality as-surance approach that supports both collaboration and content improvement.

TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
Graz University of Technology (AT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Library Science and Administration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Developing and Testing a Peer-Review Process for Content Quality Assurance in MOOCs: A Case Study on an E-Assessment Course. Presentation at ICL 2025 in Budapest. · TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS