Democratization in East Asia: The Role of Regime Endogeneity and Geopolitical Currents

This study examines how a regime’s endogeneity (its internal origins independent of significant external support) and international pressures shape democratization trajectories in East Asian Confucian societies. Challenging simplistic cultural determinism, the article argues that while classical Confucianism is not inherently anti-democratic, “ruler-made legacies” from the imperial era can hinder or facilitate democratic change depending on the ruling elites’ strategic choices. Comparative analysis of Singapore and South Korea illustrates this: Singapore’s highly endogenous regime effectively resists external democratic pressures and controls modernization to bolster non-democratic rule. Conversely, South Korea’s exogenous regime, lacking deep internal legitimacy and facing sustained international pressure, was compelled towards democratization. Modernization’s democratizing potential, therefore, depends on the regime type and geopolitical environment.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asian Governance
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63851/001c.144278
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratization in East Asia: The Role of Regime Endogeneity and Geopolitical Currents

Journal of Asian Governance
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
article

Democratization in East Asia: The Role of Regime Endogeneity and Geopolitical Currents

article en

Abstract

This study examines how a regime’s endogeneity (its internal origins independent of significant external support) and international pressures shape democratization trajectories in East Asian Confucian societies. Challenging simplistic cultural determinism, the article argues that while classical Confucianism is not inherently anti-democratic, “ruler-made legacies” from the imperial era can hinder or facilitate democratic change depending on the ruling elites’ strategic choices. Comparative analysis of Singapore and South Korea illustrates this: Singapore’s highly endogenous regime effectively resists external democratic pressures and controls modernization to bolster non-democratic rule. Conversely, South Korea’s exogenous regime, lacking deep internal legitimacy and facing sustained international pressure, was compelled towards democratization. Modernization’s democratizing potential, therefore, depends on the regime type and geopolitical environment.

Journal of Asian GovernanceVol. 2(3)
National Taiwan University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Socioeconomic Development in Asia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.