PRIVATE MILITARY COMPANIES AND THE EROSION OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY: THE COMMODIFICATION OF SECURITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY.

This paper explores the rise in the use of Private Military Companies (PMCs) in the 21st century for state security and how they may weaken state sovereignty. Traditionally, the sovereignty of states has been grounded in their power and monopoly to use force legitimately. While some scholars argue that PMCs offer military efficiency, flexibility, and tactical advantages, this paper examines how long-term contracting of military security can undermine state legitimacy, weaken sovereignty, increase human rights violations, and threaten international security governance. It also recommends that stronger, comprehensive legal frameworks and international regulations are necessary to ensure PMCs are held accountable and regulated. More importantly, states must have a stronger political will to improve their security services in specialisation, welfare, and transparency.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17225117
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRIVATE MILITARY COMPANIES AND THE EROSION OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY: THE COMMODIFICATION OF SECURITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

PRIVATE MILITARY COMPANIES AND THE EROSION OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY: THE COMMODIFICATION OF SECURITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY.

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the rise in the use of Private Military Companies (PMCs) in the 21st century for state security and how they may weaken state sovereignty. Traditionally, the sovereignty of states has been grounded in their power and monopoly to use force legitimately. While some scholars argue that PMCs offer military efficiency, flexibility, and tactical advantages, this paper examines how long-term contracting of military security can undermine state legitimacy, weaken sovereignty, increase human rights violations, and threaten international security governance. It also recommends that stronger, comprehensive legal frameworks and international regulations are necessary to ensure PMCs are held accountable and regulated. More importantly, states must have a stronger political will to improve their security services in specialisation, welfare, and transparency.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Coventry University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.