Diagnostic Performance of Genexpert MTB/RIF for Early Detection of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the key health challenges in the world, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Conventional diagnostic tools, such as microscopy of smears, are low in sensitivity, whereas culture tools, though sensitive, are slow. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay is a rapid method of detection; however, its local diagnostic capabilities require evaluation. Objective: To determine the diagnostic quality of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF test versus sputum smear microscopy for early Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in DG Khan. Methodology: The study was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted over a six-month period (January 1, 2025, to June 30, 2025) at the Medicine and Pulmonology departments of Allama Iqbal Teaching Hospital, Dera Ghazi Khan. One hundred ninety clinically suspected pulmonary TB patients were recruited. Sputum samples were analyzed using both smear microscopy and GeneXpert MTB/RIF. Diagnostic performance indices, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, were calculated using culture results as the reference standard. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 25. Results: Of the 190 patients, the mean age was 37.2 ± 16.8 years, with 51.6% males and 48.4% females. The majority were from rural areas (72.6%) and farmers by occupation (62.1%). GeneXpert detected 156 positive cases compared with 108 by smear microscopy, including 54 additional smear-negative but GeneXpert-positive cases. Overall, the assay's accuracy was 71.6%, with a sensitivity of 71.2%, a specificity of 72.0%, a PPV of 91.8%, and an NPV of 35.5%. A moderate correlation was observed between smear microscopy results and the study's findings (r = 0.48, p < 0.001). Conclusion: GeneXpert MTB/RIF demonstrated a superior diagnostic yield compared to smear microscopy, particularly in smear-negative cases, making it a valuable tool for enhancing TB detection in high-burden settings.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i8.1985
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Performance of Genexpert MTB/RIF for Early Detection of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Diagnostic Performance of Genexpert MTB/RIF for Early Detection of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

article en

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the key health challenges in the world, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Conventional diagnostic tools, such as microscopy of smears, are low in sensitivity, whereas culture tools, though sensitive, are slow. The GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay is a rapid method of detection; however, its local diagnostic capabilities require evaluation. Objective: To determine the diagnostic quality of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF test versus sputum smear microscopy for early Diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in DG Khan. Methodology: The study was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted over a six-month period (January 1, 2025, to June 30, 2025) at the Medicine and Pulmonology departments of Allama Iqbal Teaching Hospital, Dera Ghazi Khan. One hundred ninety clinically suspected pulmonary TB patients were recruited. Sputum samples were analyzed using both smear microscopy and GeneXpert MTB/RIF. Diagnostic performance indices, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy, were calculated using culture results as the reference standard. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 25. Results: Of the 190 patients, the mean age was 37.2 ± 16.8 years, with 51.6% males and 48.4% females. The majority were from rural areas (72.6%) and farmers by occupation (62.1%). GeneXpert detected 156 positive cases compared with 108 by smear microscopy, including 54 additional smear-negative but GeneXpert-positive cases. Overall, the assay's accuracy was 71.6%, with a sensitivity of 71.2%, a specificity of 72.0%, a PPV of 91.8%, and an NPV of 35.5%. A moderate correlation was observed between smear microscopy results and the study's findings (r = 0.48, p < 0.001). Conclusion: GeneXpert MTB/RIF demonstrated a superior diagnostic yield compared to smear microscopy, particularly in smear-negative cases, making it a valuable tool for enhancing TB detection in high-burden settings.

Biological and Clinical Sciences Research JournalVol. 6(8)
Allama Iqbal Open University (PK), Allama Iqbal Medical College (PK)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.