Artificial Intelligence as a Cultural Clone: Beyond Extension and Deification

This paper challenges the dominant narratives that frame artificial intelligence either as a trivial extension of human cognition or as an emergent autonomous subject. Instead, it proposes a novel framework: AI as a cultural clone. Drawing on the analogy of biological cloning, I argue that AI systems inherit the cultural DNA of their creators—the data, algorithms, and intentions that shape them. Like biological clones, AI replicates both the strengths and the pathologies of its source. To safeguard against unhealthy replication, the paper introduces the concept of a civilizational bios—a cultural operating system functioning like public health for cognition. This framework emphasizes ethical hygiene, preventive governance, and institutional oversight as necessary mechanisms for ensuring that AI reproduces values conducive to human flourishing. By reframing AI as a cultural clone, the article moves beyond misplaced fears of machinic divinity and narrow conceptions of toolhood. It offers a balanced perspective that situates AI within cultural inheritance and responsibility, opening new directions for research in philosophy of technology,

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17217148
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence as a Cultural Clone: Beyond Extension and Deification

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Artificial Intelligence as a Cultural Clone: Beyond Extension and Deification

article en

Abstract

This paper challenges the dominant narratives that frame artificial intelligence either as a trivial extension of human cognition or as an emergent autonomous subject. Instead, it proposes a novel framework: AI as a cultural clone. Drawing on the analogy of biological cloning, I argue that AI systems inherit the cultural DNA of their creators—the data, algorithms, and intentions that shape them. Like biological clones, AI replicates both the strengths and the pathologies of its source. To safeguard against unhealthy replication, the paper introduces the concept of a civilizational bios—a cultural operating system functioning like public health for cognition. This framework emphasizes ethical hygiene, preventive governance, and institutional oversight as necessary mechanisms for ensuring that AI reproduces values conducive to human flourishing. By reframing AI as a cultural clone, the article moves beyond misplaced fears of machinic divinity and narrow conceptions of toolhood. It offers a balanced perspective that situates AI within cultural inheritance and responsibility, opening new directions for research in philosophy of technology,

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.