Should we be Lottocrats?

In light of representative democracy’s failures, from an inability to effectively address pressing problems to the yawning economic inequality and deep polarization that it sustains, the need for reform is obvious and urgent. In the democratic theory literature, there is growing interest in the potential of lottery-based political institutions as replacements for traditional forms of electoral democracy. Alexander Guerrero’s Lottocracy (Oxford University Press, 2024) is among the most interesting, challenging, and provocative arguments for lottery-based political institutions. Engaging with its arguments is a valuable opportunity to assess where the case for such institutions stands. In this critical essay, we develop concerns about (1) the critique of representative democracy that has given rise to interest in lottery-based solutions, and (2) the potential of lottery-based solutions to solve the problems that ail representative democracies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Free & Equal A Journal of Ethics and Public Affairs
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/fe.23191
Primary Topic
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Should we be Lottocrats?

Free & Equal A Journal of Ethics and Public Affairs
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
article

Should we be Lottocrats?

article en

Abstract

In light of representative democracy’s failures, from an inability to effectively address pressing problems to the yawning economic inequality and deep polarization that it sustains, the need for reform is obvious and urgent. In the democratic theory literature, there is growing interest in the potential of lottery-based political institutions as replacements for traditional forms of electoral democracy. Alexander Guerrero’s Lottocracy (Oxford University Press, 2024) is among the most interesting, challenging, and provocative arguments for lottery-based political institutions. Engaging with its arguments is a valuable opportunity to assess where the case for such institutions stands. In this critical essay, we develop concerns about (1) the critique of representative democracy that has given rise to interest in lottery-based solutions, and (2) the potential of lottery-based solutions to solve the problems that ail representative democracies.

Free & Equal A Journal of Ethics and Public AffairsVol. 1(2)
New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.