Intext Codes or Posttext Comments? Which One Is More Influential in Improving the Intermediate and Advanced EFL Learners' Written Grammatical Accuracy?

Many teachers provide learners with different types of feedback to help language learners write more accurately. In the present research, the author examined the effect of intext coded and uncoded feedback on written grammatical accuracy of Iranian advanced and intermediate learners. The researcher selected three classes of advanced and three intermediate classes of EFL Iranian students. After homogenizing students, the researcher randomly selected one intermediate and one advanced class as control groups and the other four classes as experimental. The experimental groups received posttext and intext coded feedback whereas the control one received uncoded feedback. The results indicated that all feedback types were effective in the posttest. However, posttext and intext feedback were more effective than uncoded feedback. Since feedback provides learners with an opportunity to revise their essays, one can consider its role as an effective one in learning and teaching English. The results also indicated that the advanced language learners outperformed the intermediate ones.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literature
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.16.4.2
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intext Codes or Posttext Comments? Which One Is More Influential in Improving the Intermediate and Advanced EFL Learners' Written Grammatical Accuracy?

Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literature
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Intext Codes or Posttext Comments? Which One Is More Influential in Improving the Intermediate and Advanced EFL Learners' Written Grammatical Accuracy?

article en

Abstract

Many teachers provide learners with different types of feedback to help language learners write more accurately. In the present research, the author examined the effect of intext coded and uncoded feedback on written grammatical accuracy of Iranian advanced and intermediate learners. The researcher selected three classes of advanced and three intermediate classes of EFL Iranian students. After homogenizing students, the researcher randomly selected one intermediate and one advanced class as control groups and the other four classes as experimental. The experimental groups received posttext and intext coded feedback whereas the control one received uncoded feedback. The results indicated that all feedback types were effective in the posttest. However, posttext and intext feedback were more effective than uncoded feedback. Since feedback provides learners with an opportunity to revise their essays, one can consider its role as an effective one in learning and teaching English. The results also indicated that the advanced language learners outperformed the intermediate ones.

Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and LiteratureVol. 16(4)
Islamic Azad University Tonekabon (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.