Regenerative Therapies inTendinopathies and PartialRotator Cuff Tears

Rotator cuff tendinopathies and partial‑thickness tears are common causes of shoulder pain, particularly in adults over 40, with a significant impact on quality of life and work capacity. While conservative treatment remains the first‑line approach, a substantial proportion of patients experience suboptimal outcomes. In recent years, regenerative therapies have emerged as promising alternatives or adjuncts to traditional treatment, aiming to promote tendon healing, reduce pain, and delay or avoid surgical intervention. This review critically evaluates the current evidence on regenerative interventions, including corticosteroid injections, hyaluronic acid, prolotherapy, platelet‑rich plasma (PRP), and cell‑based therapies such as bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and adipose‑derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD‑MSCs). Among these, leukocyte‑poor PRP (LP‑PRP) demonstrates the most consistent results in pain relief and functional improvement, with sustained effects observed for up to 12 months. Prolotherapy and hyaluronic acid, particularly in high‑molecular‑weight formulations, also show favorable short‑term results. Conversely, corticosteroids provide only transient analgesia and may negatively affect tendon healing if administered postoperatively. Cell‑based therapies have shown encouraging preliminary findings, including structural tendon improvement and reduction in lesion size. However, current studies are limited by methodological heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and short follow‑up periods, precluding definitive conclusions. This article emphasizes the need for individualized treatment selection based on patient profile, clinical severity, and access to therapy. Although some regenerative strategies are becoming more accessible, many remain experimental and should be restricted to research protocols until further high‑quality evidence becomes available. Therapeutic decisions should involve shared decision‑making, clearly addressing benefits, limitations, costs, and safety profiles of each modality.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic SPOT
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82189/spot.75
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Water, and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regenerative Therapies inTendinopathies and PartialRotator Cuff Tears

Orthopaedic SPOT
Agriculture, Water, and Health
article

Regenerative Therapies inTendinopathies and PartialRotator Cuff Tears

article en

Abstract

Rotator cuff tendinopathies and partial‑thickness tears are common causes of shoulder pain, particularly in adults over 40, with a significant impact on quality of life and work capacity. While conservative treatment remains the first‑line approach, a substantial proportion of patients experience suboptimal outcomes. In recent years, regenerative therapies have emerged as promising alternatives or adjuncts to traditional treatment, aiming to promote tendon healing, reduce pain, and delay or avoid surgical intervention. This review critically evaluates the current evidence on regenerative interventions, including corticosteroid injections, hyaluronic acid, prolotherapy, platelet‑rich plasma (PRP), and cell‑based therapies such as bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and adipose‑derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD‑MSCs). Among these, leukocyte‑poor PRP (LP‑PRP) demonstrates the most consistent results in pain relief and functional improvement, with sustained effects observed for up to 12 months. Prolotherapy and hyaluronic acid, particularly in high‑molecular‑weight formulations, also show favorable short‑term results. Conversely, corticosteroids provide only transient analgesia and may negatively affect tendon healing if administered postoperatively. Cell‑based therapies have shown encouraging preliminary findings, including structural tendon improvement and reduction in lesion size. However, current studies are limited by methodological heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and short follow‑up periods, precluding definitive conclusions. This article emphasizes the need for individualized treatment selection based on patient profile, clinical severity, and access to therapy. Although some regenerative strategies are becoming more accessible, many remain experimental and should be restricted to research protocols until further high‑quality evidence becomes available. Therapeutic decisions should involve shared decision‑making, clearly addressing benefits, limitations, costs, and safety profiles of each modality.

Orthopaedic SPOT
Faculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí (BR), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Agriculture, Water, and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.