A multi-objective inverse (MOIn) energy system modelling method for guiding early technology development

When including emerging technologies in energy system modelling, uncertainties are inevitable in early-development technical estimations, leading to uninformative/misleading results. Knowledge of the worst, yet still viable parameter values, without extensive parameter variation, is desirable, to reconcile energy modellers’ system-level and technology developers’ perspectives. We develop a novel inverse optimisation approach, turning traditional input parameters of energy system models into optimisation variables and, hence, outputs. This addition of variables leads to a multi-objective optimisation problem, which models trade-offs between multiple interests at system vs technology level. We employ the augmented epsilon-constraint method to solve the resulting multi-objective inverse (MOIn) optimisation problem. MOIn determines worst-case technical specification targets, guides development pathways, informs about market potentials and determines technology roles. We implement MOIn in the energy system modelling framework Backbone. We demonstrate our implementation for Carnot Batteries as emerging technology in the Central Western Europe power system, inverting the capital expenditure (CAPEX) parameter, estimated from 20 €/kW/a to 913 €/kW/a in literature. We find the maximum CAPEX at which CBs are still endogenously invested is low compared to these benchmarks. As round-trip efficiency (RTE) and energy-to-power (EtP) ratios decrease, CAPEX for CBs to remain competitive becomes stricter. Increasing EtP ratios more efficiently affects CAPEX and total system cost than increasing RTEs. Further results highlight the high sensitivity of CBs’ market potential. At low CAPEX, CBs dominate as long-term storage, but are replaced by hydrogen with rising CAPEX, shifting CBs towards mid-term storage. Overall, MOIn uniquely integrates energy system modelling with technical parameter analysis, fostering collaboration. • Novel inverse optimisation method to turn energy model input parameters into outputs. • Multi-objective optimisation to model trade-offs between different interest groups. • Implementation of methodology in open-source modelling framework Backbone. • Informing and guiding early product development from a market perspective. • Case study reveals Carnot Battery CAPEX limits and sensitivities.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120520
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-objective inverse (MOIn) energy system modelling method for guiding early technology development

2 citations
Energy Conversion and Management
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
4.96
article

A multi-objective inverse (MOIn) energy system modelling method for guiding early technology development

article en
2 citations

Abstract

When including emerging technologies in energy system modelling, uncertainties are inevitable in early-development technical estimations, leading to uninformative/misleading results. Knowledge of the worst, yet still viable parameter values, without extensive parameter variation, is desirable, to reconcile energy modellers’ system-level and technology developers’ perspectives. We develop a novel inverse optimisation approach, turning traditional input parameters of energy system models into optimisation variables and, hence, outputs. This addition of variables leads to a multi-objective optimisation problem, which models trade-offs between multiple interests at system vs technology level. We employ the augmented epsilon-constraint method to solve the resulting multi-objective inverse (MOIn) optimisation problem. MOIn determines worst-case technical specification targets, guides development pathways, informs about market potentials and determines technology roles. We implement MOIn in the energy system modelling framework Backbone. We demonstrate our implementation for Carnot Batteries as emerging technology in the Central Western Europe power system, inverting the capital expenditure (CAPEX) parameter, estimated from 20 €/kW/a to 913 €/kW/a in literature. We find the maximum CAPEX at which CBs are still endogenously invested is low compared to these benchmarks. As round-trip efficiency (RTE) and energy-to-power (EtP) ratios decrease, CAPEX for CBs to remain competitive becomes stricter. Increasing EtP ratios more efficiently affects CAPEX and total system cost than increasing RTEs. Further results highlight the high sensitivity of CBs’ market potential. At low CAPEX, CBs dominate as long-term storage, but are replaced by hydrogen with rising CAPEX, shifting CBs towards mid-term storage. Overall, MOIn uniquely integrates energy system modelling with technical parameter analysis, fostering collaboration. • Novel inverse optimisation method to turn energy model input parameters into outputs. • Multi-objective optimisation to model trade-offs between different interest groups. • Implementation of methodology in open-source modelling framework Backbone. • Informing and guiding early product development from a market perspective. • Case study reveals Carnot Battery CAPEX limits and sensitivities.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 347
University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.