Discourse and Ideology in Graphic Design Manifestos: A Comparative Analysis Based on Critical Discourse Theory

This study examines five fundamental manifestos that have created significant turning points in the field of graphic design—First Things First (1964), First Things First 2000, An Incomplete Manifesto for Growth (1998), The Decolonising Design Manifesto (2019) and The Karlskrona Manifesto for Sustainability Design (2014)—using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). In addition to defining aesthetic tendencies, manifestos are also known to be a discursive tool that reveals ideological conflicts and calls the designer subject to certain positions. The theoretical foundation of the study is based on Fairclough's three-dimensional discourse model, Althusser's ideology and interpellation theory, Foucault's knowledge/power relations, and van Dijk's ideological discourse analysis. The analyses demonstrate that manifestos produce ideological structures at textual, discursive, and social levels. In this context, it can be said that the study demonstrates that graphic design manifestos also function as ethical, political, and cultural intervention tools. Keywords: Graphic Design Manifestos, Critical Discourse Analysis, Ideology and Design, Political Visual Culture.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17169537
Primary Topic
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discourse and Ideology in Graphic Design Manifestos: A Comparative Analysis Based on Critical Discourse Theory

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
article

Discourse and Ideology in Graphic Design Manifestos: A Comparative Analysis Based on Critical Discourse Theory

article en

Abstract

This study examines five fundamental manifestos that have created significant turning points in the field of graphic design—First Things First (1964), First Things First 2000, An Incomplete Manifesto for Growth (1998), The Decolonising Design Manifesto (2019) and The Karlskrona Manifesto for Sustainability Design (2014)—using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). In addition to defining aesthetic tendencies, manifestos are also known to be a discursive tool that reveals ideological conflicts and calls the designer subject to certain positions. The theoretical foundation of the study is based on Fairclough's three-dimensional discourse model, Althusser's ideology and interpellation theory, Foucault's knowledge/power relations, and van Dijk's ideological discourse analysis. The analyses demonstrate that manifestos produce ideological structures at textual, discursive, and social levels. In this context, it can be said that the study demonstrates that graphic design manifestos also function as ethical, political, and cultural intervention tools. Keywords: Graphic Design Manifestos, Critical Discourse Analysis, Ideology and Design, Political Visual Culture.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Discourse and Ideology in Graphic Design Manifestos: A Comparative Analysis Based on Critical Discourse Theory · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS