Exploring the Relationship Between Ambivalent Sexism, Aggression, and Rejection Sensitivity in University Students

This study investigated the relationship between ambivalent sexism, aggressive attitudes, and rejection sensitivity among university students. A correlational survey design was employed, involving 200 students aged 18–24 enrolled at universities in Istanbul. Data were gathered using the Demographic Information Form, Aggression Questionnaire, Ambivalent Sexism Scale, and Rejection Sensitivity Scale. Analyses were conducted in SPSS and included descriptive statistics, normality tests, reliability checks, Pearson correlations, and group comparisons via independent-samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA. Results indicated a significant positive correlation between ambivalent sexism and aggression. However, neither ambivalent sexism nor aggression was significantly associated with rejection sensitivity. Gender differences emerged: male students reported higher levels of ambivalent sexism and rejection sensitivity compared to females, while no significant differences were observed in aggression by gender. Furthermore, none of the variables showed differences based on age, relationship status, or income level. Overall, the findings suggest that higher ambivalent sexism is linked to increased aggression among university students, underscoring the role of gender-related attitudes in shaping interpersonal behaviors. These results highlight the need for educational interventions addressing sexist attitudes and promoting gender equality, which may help reduce aggression and foster healthier campus relationships. Keywords: Aggressive Attitudes, Ambivalent Sexism, Rejection Sensitivity

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17215093
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Relationship Between Ambivalent Sexism, Aggression, and Rejection Sensitivity in University Students

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Exploring the Relationship Between Ambivalent Sexism, Aggression, and Rejection Sensitivity in University Students

article en

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between ambivalent sexism, aggressive attitudes, and rejection sensitivity among university students. A correlational survey design was employed, involving 200 students aged 18–24 enrolled at universities in Istanbul. Data were gathered using the Demographic Information Form, Aggression Questionnaire, Ambivalent Sexism Scale, and Rejection Sensitivity Scale. Analyses were conducted in SPSS and included descriptive statistics, normality tests, reliability checks, Pearson correlations, and group comparisons via independent-samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA. Results indicated a significant positive correlation between ambivalent sexism and aggression. However, neither ambivalent sexism nor aggression was significantly associated with rejection sensitivity. Gender differences emerged: male students reported higher levels of ambivalent sexism and rejection sensitivity compared to females, while no significant differences were observed in aggression by gender. Furthermore, none of the variables showed differences based on age, relationship status, or income level. Overall, the findings suggest that higher ambivalent sexism is linked to increased aggression among university students, underscoring the role of gender-related attitudes in shaping interpersonal behaviors. These results highlight the need for educational interventions addressing sexist attitudes and promoting gender equality, which may help reduce aggression and foster healthier campus relationships. Keywords: Aggressive Attitudes, Ambivalent Sexism, Rejection Sensitivity

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.