POLITICAL RECRUITMENT AT THE BRAZILIAN COURT OF AUDITORS: A PROSOPOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE NOMINEES (1990–2022)

This article analyzes the appointment process of the ministers of the Federal Court of Accounts of Brazil (Tribunal de Contas da União – TCU) between 1990 and 2022, focusing on the tension between technical and political criteria that shape the recruitment of institutional elites in Brazil. The central objective is to investigate to what extent previous political experience influences the probability of appointment to the detriment of technical profiles. The study employs a deductive method, supported by a literature review on elites and political recruitment, and applies prosopographical procedures to collect and systematize primary and secondary data on the trajectories of the twenty ministers appointed in the period. The analysis reveals that, although the 1988 Constitution establishes positions for auditors and members of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Accounts, ensuring some technical representation, most appointments were guided by political criteria: 70% of the nominations were made by the National Congress, of which 85.7% of ministers were affiliated with political parties at the time of appointment, and 78.6% were linked to the governing coalition. In this context, technical capital operates as a formal requirement of legitimacy, but not as a decisive criterion. The study concludes that the TCU, although formally designed as a technical oversight body, in practice performs a process of political recruitment of its ministers, reproducing parliamentary and governmental elites under the guise of legal formalism.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17204282
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

POLITICAL RECRUITMENT AT THE BRAZILIAN COURT OF AUDITORS: A PROSOPOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE NOMINEES (1990–2022)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

POLITICAL RECRUITMENT AT THE BRAZILIAN COURT OF AUDITORS: A PROSOPOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE NOMINEES (1990–2022)

article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the appointment process of the ministers of the Federal Court of Accounts of Brazil (Tribunal de Contas da União – TCU) between 1990 and 2022, focusing on the tension between technical and political criteria that shape the recruitment of institutional elites in Brazil. The central objective is to investigate to what extent previous political experience influences the probability of appointment to the detriment of technical profiles. The study employs a deductive method, supported by a literature review on elites and political recruitment, and applies prosopographical procedures to collect and systematize primary and secondary data on the trajectories of the twenty ministers appointed in the period. The analysis reveals that, although the 1988 Constitution establishes positions for auditors and members of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of Accounts, ensuring some technical representation, most appointments were guided by political criteria: 70% of the nominations were made by the National Congress, of which 85.7% of ministers were affiliated with political parties at the time of appointment, and 78.6% were linked to the governing coalition. In this context, technical capital operates as a formal requirement of legitimacy, but not as a decisive criterion. The study concludes that the TCU, although formally designed as a technical oversight body, in practice performs a process of political recruitment of its ministers, reproducing parliamentary and governmental elites under the guise of legal formalism.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidade Estadual do Ceará (BR), Universidade Federal do Piauí (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.