Developmental changes in students’ mindset meaning systems: The role of perceived classroom goal structures

• Four profiles were identified based on students’ mindset, effort beliefs, and goals. • Students’ beliefs and goals became more coherent during early adolescence. • Many students shifted from growth to fixed mindset profiles over this period. • Students’ profile changes were predicted by perceived classroom goal structures. Mindsets impact learning by shaping students’ beliefs about effort and achievement goals, creating two distinct meaning systems: a growth mindset-mastery goal system and a fixed mindset-performance goal system. Recent studies reveal that students often hold more complex combinations (profiles) of mindset-related beliefs and goals. Yet, little is known about how these profiles change over time and the contextual factors contributing to the changes. This longitudinal study used a pattern-oriented approach to investigate (a) the naturally occurring profiles based on students’ mindset, effort beliefs, and goals, (b) the stability and change in these profiles over time, and (c) the influence of perceived classroom goal structures on profile changes. The study followed 430 students (210 girls, M age at Time 1 = 12.86 years) over the first two years of secondary school. Four consistent profiles were identified in both years: Growth Mindset-Low Performance Goals , Growth Mindset-Moderate Performance Goals , Mixed Mindset-High Performance Goals , and Fixed Mindset-Disengaged . Although the Growth Mindset-Low Performance Goals profile was the largest in the first year (32 %), there was a noticeable shift toward less desirable profiles over time, with the Fixed Mindset-Disengaged profile becoming the most common by the second year (33 %). Students who initially perceived high mastery and low performance-avoidance goal structures were more likely to belong to and remain in growth mindset profiles. These findings deepen our understanding of the nature, stability, and contextual influences on students’ mindset meaning systems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102417
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developmental changes in students’ mindset meaning systems: The role of perceived classroom goal structures

1 citations
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Influenza Virus Research Studies
1.35
article

Developmental changes in students’ mindset meaning systems: The role of perceived classroom goal structures

article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Four profiles were identified based on students’ mindset, effort beliefs, and goals. • Students’ beliefs and goals became more coherent during early adolescence. • Many students shifted from growth to fixed mindset profiles over this period. • Students’ profile changes were predicted by perceived classroom goal structures. Mindsets impact learning by shaping students’ beliefs about effort and achievement goals, creating two distinct meaning systems: a growth mindset-mastery goal system and a fixed mindset-performance goal system. Recent studies reveal that students often hold more complex combinations (profiles) of mindset-related beliefs and goals. Yet, little is known about how these profiles change over time and the contextual factors contributing to the changes. This longitudinal study used a pattern-oriented approach to investigate (a) the naturally occurring profiles based on students’ mindset, effort beliefs, and goals, (b) the stability and change in these profiles over time, and (c) the influence of perceived classroom goal structures on profile changes. The study followed 430 students (210 girls, M age at Time 1 = 12.86 years) over the first two years of secondary school. Four consistent profiles were identified in both years: Growth Mindset-Low Performance Goals , Growth Mindset-Moderate Performance Goals , Mixed Mindset-High Performance Goals , and Fixed Mindset-Disengaged . Although the Growth Mindset-Low Performance Goals profile was the largest in the first year (32 %), there was a noticeable shift toward less desirable profiles over time, with the Fixed Mindset-Disengaged profile becoming the most common by the second year (33 %). Students who initially perceived high mastery and low performance-avoidance goal structures were more likely to belong to and remain in growth mindset profiles. These findings deepen our understanding of the nature, stability, and contextual influences on students’ mindset meaning systems.

Contemporary Educational PsychologyVol. 83
University of Helsinki (FI), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.