The Domain of Islamic Law in the Post-Reform Ordinary Civil Courts of the Russian Empire

This article analyzes the place of Islamic law within the post-reform ordinary civil court system of the Russian Empire. Drawing on judicial case materials, petitions, Senate rulings, and interdepartmental correspondence, the study examines how sharīʿa norms — primarily in the areas of inheritance and marital-property relations — were applied in courts that were not originally designed for religious adjudication. The author demonstrates that in several of its key domains, Islamic law was not marginalized but rather institutionalized within the judicial system as a legitimate legal foundation for Muslim subjects. The modernization and centralization of the judiciary, along with the unification of procedural rules and the development of a system of appeals, paradoxically coincided with the consolidation of domains of particularistic law, including Muslim legal norms. Challenging the prevailing historiographical view of legal pluralism as a peripheral phenomenon or an administrative compromise, the article argues that it should be understood as a stable and institutionally embedded feature of the late imperial legal order. Methodologically, the study builds on insights from legal anthropology and the “law and society” approach, combining these perspectives with empirical historical analysis. Islamic law is examined not as a closed religious system but as a set of interpretive norms operating within specific judicial and administrative contexts. The article contends that legal pluralism in the Russian Empire was not a temporary concession but a durable component of its legal regime.

Publication Details

Journal
Territory Journal of Historical Research
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17323/tjhr.2025.2.27883
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Domain of Islamic Law in the Post-Reform Ordinary Civil Courts of the Russian Empire

Territory Journal of Historical Research
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

The Domain of Islamic Law in the Post-Reform Ordinary Civil Courts of the Russian Empire

article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the place of Islamic law within the post-reform ordinary civil court system of the Russian Empire. Drawing on judicial case materials, petitions, Senate rulings, and interdepartmental correspondence, the study examines how sharīʿa norms — primarily in the areas of inheritance and marital-property relations — were applied in courts that were not originally designed for religious adjudication. The author demonstrates that in several of its key domains, Islamic law was not marginalized but rather institutionalized within the judicial system as a legitimate legal foundation for Muslim subjects. The modernization and centralization of the judiciary, along with the unification of procedural rules and the development of a system of appeals, paradoxically coincided with the consolidation of domains of particularistic law, including Muslim legal norms. Challenging the prevailing historiographical view of legal pluralism as a peripheral phenomenon or an administrative compromise, the article argues that it should be understood as a stable and institutionally embedded feature of the late imperial legal order. Methodologically, the study builds on insights from legal anthropology and the “law and society” approach, combining these perspectives with empirical historical analysis. Islamic law is examined not as a closed religious system but as a set of interpretive norms operating within specific judicial and administrative contexts. The article contends that legal pluralism in the Russian Empire was not a temporary concession but a durable component of its legal regime.

Territory Journal of Historical ResearchVol. 1(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.