AI’s predictable memory in financial analysis

Look-ahead bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) arises when information that would not have been available at the time of prediction is included in the training data and inflates prediction performance. This paper proposes a practical methodology to quantify look-ahead bias in financial applications. By prompting LLMs to retrieve historical stock returns without context, we construct a proxy to estimate memorization-driven predictability. We show that the bias varies predictably with data frequency, model size, and aggregation level: smaller models and finer data granularity exhibit negligible bias. Our results help researchers navigate the trade-off between statistical power and bias in LLMs. • We identify look-ahead bias by querying the model to recall a specific information with no context. • Look ahead bias is more severe for lower frequencies, indexes, and large models. • When working with relatively small models at high frequencies look-ahead bias is insignificant.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics Letters
Published
2025-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112602
Primary Topic
Transport and Economic Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI’s predictable memory in financial analysis

Economics Letters
Transport and Economic Policies
article

AI’s predictable memory in financial analysis

article en

Abstract

Look-ahead bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) arises when information that would not have been available at the time of prediction is included in the training data and inflates prediction performance. This paper proposes a practical methodology to quantify look-ahead bias in financial applications. By prompting LLMs to retrieve historical stock returns without context, we construct a proxy to estimate memorization-driven predictability. We show that the bias varies predictably with data frequency, model size, and aggregation level: smaller models and finer data granularity exhibit negligible bias. Our results help researchers navigate the trade-off between statistical power and bias in LLMs. • We identify look-ahead bias by querying the model to recall a specific information with no context. • Look ahead bias is more severe for lower frequencies, indexes, and large models. • When working with relatively small models at high frequencies look-ahead bias is insignificant.

Economics LettersVol. 256
École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales (FR), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of Luxembourg (LU), CY Cergy Paris Université (FR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Transport and Economic Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI’s predictable memory in financial analysis · Economics Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS