Еvidence Evaluation in Official Crimes Consideration in the pre-reform Court (based on the Materials of the Vologda Criminal Court Chamber)

The article examines the features of criminal proceedings related to the evidence assessment system in the first half of the 19th century. The research is based on the materials of official crimes considered by the Vologda Criminal Court Chamber in 1802–1855. More than 1,300 crimes were analyzed that allowed not only to obtain statistical data but also to reflect the specifics of the implementation of the criminal proceedings principles as well as to consider evidence assessment practice and the use of specific examples. The study demonstrated that the formal theory of evidence provided ample opportunities to evade responsibility or achieve mitigation of punishment. In the absence of a sincere confession, almost any other evidence could be questioned on formal grounds.

Publication Details

Journal
Territory Journal of Historical Research
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17323/tjhr.2025.2.27882
Primary Topic
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Еvidence Evaluation in Official Crimes Consideration in the pre-reform Court (based on the Materials of the Vologda Criminal Court Chamber)

Territory Journal of Historical Research
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
article

Еvidence Evaluation in Official Crimes Consideration in the pre-reform Court (based on the Materials of the Vologda Criminal Court Chamber)

article en

Abstract

The article examines the features of criminal proceedings related to the evidence assessment system in the first half of the 19th century. The research is based on the materials of official crimes considered by the Vologda Criminal Court Chamber in 1802–1855. More than 1,300 crimes were analyzed that allowed not only to obtain statistical data but also to reflect the specifics of the implementation of the criminal proceedings principles as well as to consider evidence assessment practice and the use of specific examples. The study demonstrated that the formal theory of evidence provided ample opportunities to evade responsibility or achieve mitigation of punishment. In the absence of a sincere confession, almost any other evidence could be questioned on formal grounds.

Territory Journal of Historical ResearchVol. 1(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.