Delays, cooperation and pairwise comparisons in sequential decision-making processes

This thesis presents novel algorithms for sequential decision-making in uncertain environments, focussing on the challenges introduced by complex feedback structures. Specifically, we study scenarios that frequently arise in real-world applications, including delayed feedback, cooperation in multi-agent systems, and learning from pairwise comparisons. First, we study delayed feedback. Here, the decision-maker sequentially selects actions, but the corresponding feedback arrives later. For generalised linear bandits, we propose an algorithm and prove an upper bound on its regret. This guarantee shows that the delays cause a small additive penalty on top of what is possible with immediate feedback, substantially improving upon existing results. Subsequently, we extend the study of delayed feedback to episodic reinforcement learning and propose two approaches to handle the delays. For each approach, we provide regret bounds for numerous immediate feedback algorithms and prove that the price for delays is an additive penalty. Second, we study problem settings where numerous cooperative decision-makers interact with the environment. For these problems, we propose a black-box algorithm that takes any single-agent algorithm as input and turns it into a cooperative multi-agent algorithm. Additionally, we prove that the black-box algorithm transfers the theoretical guarantees of any single-agent algorithm to the multi-agent setting. These guarantees are comparable to, or better than, existing works. Finally, we study learning from pairwise comparisons, where the decision-maker selects two actions and receives the preferred action as their feedback. For this setting, we propose an algorithm that collects batches of preferences and uses this information to learn a policy that generates preferable actions. We prove that the cumulative sub-optimality of our algorithm grows sub-linearly without requiring strong assumptions on the preference structure. Overall, this thesis provides practical algorithms with theoretical guarantees. These results make a step towards bridging the gap between idealised models for sequential decision-making and real-world challenges.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imperial College Research Computing Service Data Repository
Published
2025-04-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25560/121481
Primary Topic
Science, Technology, and Education in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delays, cooperation and pairwise comparisons in sequential decision-making processes

Imperial College Research Computing Service Data Repository
Science, Technology, and Education in Latin America
article

Delays, cooperation and pairwise comparisons in sequential decision-making processes

article en

Abstract

This thesis presents novel algorithms for sequential decision-making in uncertain environments, focussing on the challenges introduced by complex feedback structures. Specifically, we study scenarios that frequently arise in real-world applications, including delayed feedback, cooperation in multi-agent systems, and learning from pairwise comparisons. First, we study delayed feedback. Here, the decision-maker sequentially selects actions, but the corresponding feedback arrives later. For generalised linear bandits, we propose an algorithm and prove an upper bound on its regret. This guarantee shows that the delays cause a small additive penalty on top of what is possible with immediate feedback, substantially improving upon existing results. Subsequently, we extend the study of delayed feedback to episodic reinforcement learning and propose two approaches to handle the delays. For each approach, we provide regret bounds for numerous immediate feedback algorithms and prove that the price for delays is an additive penalty. Second, we study problem settings where numerous cooperative decision-makers interact with the environment. For these problems, we propose a black-box algorithm that takes any single-agent algorithm as input and turns it into a cooperative multi-agent algorithm. Additionally, we prove that the black-box algorithm transfers the theoretical guarantees of any single-agent algorithm to the multi-agent setting. These guarantees are comparable to, or better than, existing works. Finally, we study learning from pairwise comparisons, where the decision-maker selects two actions and receives the preferred action as their feedback. For this setting, we propose an algorithm that collects batches of preferences and uses this information to learn a policy that generates preferable actions. We prove that the cumulative sub-optimality of our algorithm grows sub-linearly without requiring strong assumptions on the preference structure. Overall, this thesis provides practical algorithms with theoretical guarantees. These results make a step towards bridging the gap between idealised models for sequential decision-making and real-world challenges.

Imperial College Research Computing Service Data Repository
Imperial College London (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Science, Technology, and Education in Latin America
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.