A – 35 Cognitive and Emotional Disparities: A Comparative Analysis of Gifted Individuals and Those with Learning Disabilities

Abstract Objective This study aimed to examine cognitive performance and attentional functioning in individuals identified as gifted compared to those with a learning disability. The primary hypothesis was that gifted individuals would demonstrate higher accuracy and faster processing speed on neurocognitive tasks. Method A secondary data analysis was conducted on a sample of 1,944 participants drawn from CMIT data set. Participants were categorized into two groups based on responses to the question “Have you ever received special education services?”: Gifted (n = 1,873) and Learning Disability (n = 71). Two primary dependent variables were analyzed: (1) number of correct responses on a cognitive picture-based task and (2) average response time in milliseconds. Descriptive statistics, median absolute deviation (MAD), and effect sizes were computed. Bootstrapped simulations (10,000 iterations) were used to validate effect sizes and associated p-values. Results Gifted participants demonstrated higher median cognitive performance scores (Median = 139, MAD = 5.0) than those with learning disabilities (Median = 134, MAD = 5.0), with an observed effect size of 5.0 (p = .0003). They also exhibited faster response times (Median = 806 ms, MAD = 70.0) compared to the learning disability group (Median = 860 ms, MAD = 98.0), with an effect size of 54.0 (p = .0007). Conclusion Results highlight significant differences in both cognitive accuracy and attentional processing between gifted individuals and those with learning disabilities. These findings suggest a need for differentiated neuropsychological assessment strategies and tailored educational interventions for these distinct populations.

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf084.058
Primary Topic
Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A – 35 Cognitive and Emotional Disparities: A Comparative Analysis of Gifted Individuals and Those with Learning Disabilities

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
article

A – 35 Cognitive and Emotional Disparities: A Comparative Analysis of Gifted Individuals and Those with Learning Disabilities

article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aimed to examine cognitive performance and attentional functioning in individuals identified as gifted compared to those with a learning disability. The primary hypothesis was that gifted individuals would demonstrate higher accuracy and faster processing speed on neurocognitive tasks. Method A secondary data analysis was conducted on a sample of 1,944 participants drawn from CMIT data set. Participants were categorized into two groups based on responses to the question “Have you ever received special education services?”: Gifted (n = 1,873) and Learning Disability (n = 71). Two primary dependent variables were analyzed: (1) number of correct responses on a cognitive picture-based task and (2) average response time in milliseconds. Descriptive statistics, median absolute deviation (MAD), and effect sizes were computed. Bootstrapped simulations (10,000 iterations) were used to validate effect sizes and associated p-values. Results Gifted participants demonstrated higher median cognitive performance scores (Median = 139, MAD = 5.0) than those with learning disabilities (Median = 134, MAD = 5.0), with an observed effect size of 5.0 (p = .0003). They also exhibited faster response times (Median = 806 ms, MAD = 70.0) compared to the learning disability group (Median = 860 ms, MAD = 98.0), with an effect size of 54.0 (p = .0007). Conclusion Results highlight significant differences in both cognitive accuracy and attentional processing between gifted individuals and those with learning disabilities. These findings suggest a need for differentiated neuropsychological assessment strategies and tailored educational interventions for these distinct populations.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.