“How do Muslims reconcile religious commitment with conventional banking?”: Unpacking Muslims’ rejection of Islamic banking through consistency theories

Purpose This study investigates the paradoxical behavior of Muslims who report high religiosity and yet continue to engage with conventional banking, despite Islamic law prohibiting it due to its involvement in riba (usury), a practice deemed haram. By examining this behavior, the study aims to understand how consumers with high religiosity reconcile this contradiction between their financial practices and religious beliefs. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach was adopted, using semi-structured interviews with 23 Muslims who self-identified as having high religiosity but maintained accounts with conventional banks. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, guided by consistency theories, such as cognitive dissonance and aintegration theory, to interpret consumer attitudes and rationalizations regarding Islamic banking. Findings The findings challenge traditional assumptions within consistency theories by demonstrating that Muslims can rationalize the contradiction between their beliefs and financial behaviors through external attribution, such as perceived flaws in Islamic banking. This aligns more closely with aintegration theory, which suggests individuals can tolerate cognitive dissonance without experiencing significant psychological discomfort. Research limitations/implications The study’s findings are limited by its sample size and geographic focus on Kuwait. Future research could investigate these dynamics across different cultural contexts and with larger, more diverse samples to enhance generalizability and deepen understanding of this paradox. Practical implications The study provides actionable insights for Islamic banks on how to attract and retain consumers with high religiosity by addressing perceived authenticity and transparency concerns, which are critical in building trust and loyalty within this segment. Social implications By effectively addressing consumer skepticism and enhancing transparency, Islamic banks can better align with the values of Muslim consumers, fostering a more ethical and socially responsible financial system that resonates with their clientele’s religious principles. Originality/value This paper contributes to Islamic marketing literature by focusing on consumers with high religiosity and applying consistency theories to explore how they navigate perceived discrepancies between brand promises and actual practices in Islamic banking. This study provides insights into the psychological mechanisms that enable these consumers to balance their beliefs with their banking choices.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Islamic marketing
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-11-2024-0528
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geological Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“How do Muslims reconcile religious commitment with conventional banking?”: Unpacking Muslims’ rejection of Islamic banking through consistency theories

2 citations
Journal of Islamic marketing
Geological Modeling and Analysis
2.67
article

“How do Muslims reconcile religious commitment with conventional banking?”: Unpacking Muslims’ rejection of Islamic banking through consistency theories

article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the paradoxical behavior of Muslims who report high religiosity and yet continue to engage with conventional banking, despite Islamic law prohibiting it due to its involvement in riba (usury), a practice deemed haram. By examining this behavior, the study aims to understand how consumers with high religiosity reconcile this contradiction between their financial practices and religious beliefs. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach was adopted, using semi-structured interviews with 23 Muslims who self-identified as having high religiosity but maintained accounts with conventional banks. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, guided by consistency theories, such as cognitive dissonance and aintegration theory, to interpret consumer attitudes and rationalizations regarding Islamic banking. Findings The findings challenge traditional assumptions within consistency theories by demonstrating that Muslims can rationalize the contradiction between their beliefs and financial behaviors through external attribution, such as perceived flaws in Islamic banking. This aligns more closely with aintegration theory, which suggests individuals can tolerate cognitive dissonance without experiencing significant psychological discomfort. Research limitations/implications The study’s findings are limited by its sample size and geographic focus on Kuwait. Future research could investigate these dynamics across different cultural contexts and with larger, more diverse samples to enhance generalizability and deepen understanding of this paradox. Practical implications The study provides actionable insights for Islamic banks on how to attract and retain consumers with high religiosity by addressing perceived authenticity and transparency concerns, which are critical in building trust and loyalty within this segment. Social implications By effectively addressing consumer skepticism and enhancing transparency, Islamic banks can better align with the values of Muslim consumers, fostering a more ethical and socially responsible financial system that resonates with their clientele’s religious principles. Originality/value This paper contributes to Islamic marketing literature by focusing on consumers with high religiosity and applying consistency theories to explore how they navigate perceived discrepancies between brand promises and actual practices in Islamic banking. This study provides insights into the psychological mechanisms that enable these consumers to balance their beliefs with their banking choices.

Journal of Islamic marketing
Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geological Modeling and Analysis
2.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.