Validation of a locally designed computed tomography dose phantom: comparative assessment against a standard acrylic phantom for dose accuracy and consistency in edo and delta states, nigeria

This study compares CT dose measurements specifically CTDIvol and DLP between standard phantoms (SP) and locally constructed phantoms (CP) for head and body scans across four CT centres. Locally built phantoms, made from bent PMMA sheets and filled with water, were tested alongside standard phantoms using ionization chambers. Results show minor differences in dose estimates, with head CT showing slightly higher deviations (up to 7.18%) compared to body CT (up to 3.25%). Console-displayed values followed similar trends, with some larger variations noted, especially for head CT at one centre (up to 52.11% deviation). However, ANOVA analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between SP and CP dose values. All results were within the ±20% uncertainty range recommended by IAEA and ACR, suggesting that locally constructed phantoms are suitable alternatives for CT dose assessments in clinical practice.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nursing Research Patient Safety and Practise
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55529/jnrpsp.52.1.13
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a locally designed computed tomography dose phantom: comparative assessment against a standard acrylic phantom for dose accuracy and consistency in edo and delta states, nigeria

Journal of Nursing Research Patient Safety and Practise
Higher Education Research Studies
article

Validation of a locally designed computed tomography dose phantom: comparative assessment against a standard acrylic phantom for dose accuracy and consistency in edo and delta states, nigeria

article en

Abstract

This study compares CT dose measurements specifically CTDIvol and DLP between standard phantoms (SP) and locally constructed phantoms (CP) for head and body scans across four CT centres. Locally built phantoms, made from bent PMMA sheets and filled with water, were tested alongside standard phantoms using ionization chambers. Results show minor differences in dose estimates, with head CT showing slightly higher deviations (up to 7.18%) compared to body CT (up to 3.25%). Console-displayed values followed similar trends, with some larger variations noted, especially for head CT at one centre (up to 52.11% deviation). However, ANOVA analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between SP and CP dose values. All results were within the ±20% uncertainty range recommended by IAEA and ACR, suggesting that locally constructed phantoms are suitable alternatives for CT dose assessments in clinical practice.

Journal of Nursing Research Patient Safety and Practise(52)
Delta State University (NG), University of Delta Agbor
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.