Parression as the memory of genre and text in the work of Volodymyr Vynnychenko- emigrant (interpretation by michel foucault)

This article investigates the intricate concept of «genre memory» in literary studies, connecting it with Michel Foucault’s notion of parrhesia (fearless truth- telling). It explores how these theoretical frameworks apply to the life and emigrant literary and political works of Volodymyr Vynnychenko. The Aim. The main goal is to analyze parrhesia as a philosophical concept interpreted within genre and textual memory in contemporary literary criticism. Specifically, it demonstrates how Foucault’s political, ethical, and philosophical dimensions of parrhesia are embodied in Vynnychenko’s activities and writings, particularly during his emigration period. Methodology. The research utilizes theoretical and comparative literary analysis, integrating concepts from established literary theory and Foucault’s philosophy of parrhesia. It involves a detailed textual analysis of Volodymyr Vynnychenko’s diaries, journalistic articles, letters, and selected novels (e. g., «Slovo za toboyu, Staline!»), examining them as manifestations of parrhesiastic discourse. This interdisciplinary approach combines literary, philosophical, and cultural analysis to interpret his creative and biographical output. Conclusions. The study concludes that Volodymyr Vynnychenko consistently exemplified the parrhesiast throughout his political and literary career. His works, including diaries, journalism, and novels, served as crucial platforms for expressing uncompromising truth and fulfilling a profound moral duty, often at considerable personal risk. Vynnychenko’s embodiment of parrhesia aligns precisely with Foucault’s five core characteristics: frankness, truth, danger, criticism, and obligation. His unwavering commitment to «honesty with oneself» and his readiness to challenge authority highlight parrhesia’s enduring relevance for understanding intellectuals and politicians who assert uncomfortable truths, particularly amidst censorship and political repression. Through his fearless discourse, Vynnychenko made a unique and significant contribution to the formation of Ukrainian identity

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current issues of social sciences and history of medicine
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24061/2411-6181.1.2025.455
Primary Topic
Canadian Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parression as the memory of genre and text in the work of Volodymyr Vynnychenko- emigrant (interpretation by michel foucault)

Current issues of social sciences and history of medicine
Canadian Policy and Governance
article

Parression as the memory of genre and text in the work of Volodymyr Vynnychenko- emigrant (interpretation by michel foucault)

article en

Abstract

This article investigates the intricate concept of «genre memory» in literary studies, connecting it with Michel Foucault’s notion of parrhesia (fearless truth- telling). It explores how these theoretical frameworks apply to the life and emigrant literary and political works of Volodymyr Vynnychenko. The Aim. The main goal is to analyze parrhesia as a philosophical concept interpreted within genre and textual memory in contemporary literary criticism. Specifically, it demonstrates how Foucault’s political, ethical, and philosophical dimensions of parrhesia are embodied in Vynnychenko’s activities and writings, particularly during his emigration period. Methodology. The research utilizes theoretical and comparative literary analysis, integrating concepts from established literary theory and Foucault’s philosophy of parrhesia. It involves a detailed textual analysis of Volodymyr Vynnychenko’s diaries, journalistic articles, letters, and selected novels (e. g., «Slovo za toboyu, Staline!»), examining them as manifestations of parrhesiastic discourse. This interdisciplinary approach combines literary, philosophical, and cultural analysis to interpret his creative and biographical output. Conclusions. The study concludes that Volodymyr Vynnychenko consistently exemplified the parrhesiast throughout his political and literary career. His works, including diaries, journalism, and novels, served as crucial platforms for expressing uncompromising truth and fulfilling a profound moral duty, often at considerable personal risk. Vynnychenko’s embodiment of parrhesia aligns precisely with Foucault’s five core characteristics: frankness, truth, danger, criticism, and obligation. His unwavering commitment to «honesty with oneself» and his readiness to challenge authority highlight parrhesia’s enduring relevance for understanding intellectuals and politicians who assert uncomfortable truths, particularly amidst censorship and political repression. Through his fearless discourse, Vynnychenko made a unique and significant contribution to the formation of Ukrainian identity

Current issues of social sciences and history of medicine(1)
Weatherford College (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Canadian Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.