Exploring Gender and Academic Major Differences in Academic Self-Efficacy Among University Students in Xi’an, China

This study examines the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic performance among university students in Xi’an, China, while also exploring disparities in self-efficacy based on gender and academic major. Grounded in Bandura’s social cognitive theory, the research employs a quantitative, cross-sectional correlational design. A total of 389 undergraduate students from 29 universities were recruited through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using the College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (CASES) and the Academic Performance Scale (APS) and analyzed using Pearson correlation and independent samples t-tests. The results reveal a moderate to strong positive correlation between academic self-efficacy and academic performance (r = 0.594, p < 0.001), indicating that students with higher self-efficacy tend to achieve better academic performance. Additionally, male students exhibited significantly higher self-efficacy levels than female students, and STEM students reported greater self-efficacy compared to non-STEM students. These findings highlight the role of academic self-efficacy in student success and suggest that universities should implement targeted interventions, such as mentorship programs and structured feedback mechanisms, to enhance self-efficacy. Addressing gender disparities and providing additional support for non-STEM students can further promote equity in higher education. Future research should consider longitudinal studies and additional contextual factors to deepen the understanding of self-efficacy development and its impact on academic performance.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education and Learning Environments
Published
2025-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55121/jele.v1i1.543
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Gender and Academic Major Differences in Academic Self-Efficacy Among University Students in Xi’an, China

Journal of Education and Learning Environments
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
article

Exploring Gender and Academic Major Differences in Academic Self-Efficacy Among University Students in Xi’an, China

article en

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between academic self-efficacy and academic performance among university students in Xi’an, China, while also exploring disparities in self-efficacy based on gender and academic major. Grounded in Bandura’s social cognitive theory, the research employs a quantitative, cross-sectional correlational design. A total of 389 undergraduate students from 29 universities were recruited through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using the College Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (CASES) and the Academic Performance Scale (APS) and analyzed using Pearson correlation and independent samples t-tests. The results reveal a moderate to strong positive correlation between academic self-efficacy and academic performance (r = 0.594, p < 0.001), indicating that students with higher self-efficacy tend to achieve better academic performance. Additionally, male students exhibited significantly higher self-efficacy levels than female students, and STEM students reported greater self-efficacy compared to non-STEM students. These findings highlight the role of academic self-efficacy in student success and suggest that universities should implement targeted interventions, such as mentorship programs and structured feedback mechanisms, to enhance self-efficacy. Addressing gender disparities and providing additional support for non-STEM students can further promote equity in higher education. Future research should consider longitudinal studies and additional contextual factors to deepen the understanding of self-efficacy development and its impact on academic performance.

Journal of Education and Learning EnvironmentsVol. 1(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.