Impact of Project Delivery System Selection on Value Generation

The Project Delivery System (PDS) selection is critical for the performance of construction projects because it directly influences costs, efficiency, and stakeholder satisfaction.Despite its importance, the proper PDS selection currently disregards identifying the most relevant contractual factors and their relationship with value generation.This study compares the characteristics and behavior of various PDS to address this issue.This paper uses a comparative literature analysis of four PDS models, i.e., Design Bid Build (DBB), Design-Build (DB), Construction Management at Risk (CM), and Integrated Project Delivery (IPD), to evaluate their contractual factors and performance.The literature evidences that IPD may outperform the other models, and despite the type of PDS deployed, the most frequently used contractual factors are cost, time, communication, quality, and change.It is concluded that fostering the use of collaboration and integration processes in the structure of the PDS drives performance improvement and, hence, value generation.Further research must consider analyzing the effect of emerging factors such as sustainability and digitalization.

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction
Published
2025-06-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24928/2025/0240
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Project Delivery System Selection on Value Generation

Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

Impact of Project Delivery System Selection on Value Generation

article en

Abstract

The Project Delivery System (PDS) selection is critical for the performance of construction projects because it directly influences costs, efficiency, and stakeholder satisfaction.Despite its importance, the proper PDS selection currently disregards identifying the most relevant contractual factors and their relationship with value generation.This study compares the characteristics and behavior of various PDS to address this issue.This paper uses a comparative literature analysis of four PDS models, i.e., Design Bid Build (DBB), Design-Build (DB), Construction Management at Risk (CM), and Integrated Project Delivery (IPD), to evaluate their contractual factors and performance.The literature evidences that IPD may outperform the other models, and despite the type of PDS deployed, the most frequently used contractual factors are cost, time, communication, quality, and change.It is concluded that fostering the use of collaboration and integration processes in the structure of the PDS drives performance improvement and, hence, value generation.Further research must consider analyzing the effect of emerging factors such as sustainability and digitalization.

Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction
Agenția Națională pentru Cercetare și Dezvoltare, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, CHIST-ERA
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.