Student-centric ethical frameworks for AI-driven education: Participatory consent and data ownership in a global perspective

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into educational systems has transformed pedagogical practices; however, it has also intensified concerns regarding privacy, consent, and data governance, particularly for students. This narrative review examines the ethical challenges posed by AI in education from a student-centred perspective. It focuses on two critical dimensions: participatory consent and data ownership. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature from 2015 to 2025, the study synthesises global perspectives on student rights, cultural variance in data ethics, and emerging governance models. The review adopts a narrative methodology to analyse peer-reviewed articles, policy reports, and theoretical frameworks. Key findings highlight the inadequacy of current consent practices, the marginalisation of student voice, and the dominance of institution- or developer-centric ethical standards. The review identifies alternative models of ethical engagement, including dynamic consent, Indigenous data sovereignty frameworks, and culturally responsive design approaches. It concludes that ethical AI in education requires a paradigm shift—from compliance-based mechanisms to relational, justice-oriented frameworks that centre students as rights-bearing participants. By integrating perspectives from the Global South, Indigenous epistemologies, and critical pedagogy, this review contributes to the development of ethical frameworks that are inclusive, pluralistic, and empowering.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17207719
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Student-centric ethical frameworks for AI-driven education: Participatory consent and data ownership in a global perspective

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Student-centric ethical frameworks for AI-driven education: Participatory consent and data ownership in a global perspective

article en

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into educational systems has transformed pedagogical practices; however, it has also intensified concerns regarding privacy, consent, and data governance, particularly for students. This narrative review examines the ethical challenges posed by AI in education from a student-centred perspective. It focuses on two critical dimensions: participatory consent and data ownership. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature from 2015 to 2025, the study synthesises global perspectives on student rights, cultural variance in data ethics, and emerging governance models. The review adopts a narrative methodology to analyse peer-reviewed articles, policy reports, and theoretical frameworks. Key findings highlight the inadequacy of current consent practices, the marginalisation of student voice, and the dominance of institution- or developer-centric ethical standards. The review identifies alternative models of ethical engagement, including dynamic consent, Indigenous data sovereignty frameworks, and culturally responsive design approaches. It concludes that ethical AI in education requires a paradigm shift—from compliance-based mechanisms to relational, justice-oriented frameworks that centre students as rights-bearing participants. By integrating perspectives from the Global South, Indigenous epistemologies, and critical pedagogy, this review contributes to the development of ethical frameworks that are inclusive, pluralistic, and empowering.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Gloucestershire (GB), Wrexham University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.