Generating realistic pruning solutions for automated grape vine pruning using graph neural networks

• A pruning algorithm is presented that takes vine architecture into account and learns by example. • Key limitations from prior work have been addressed. • Models trained on 2022 season data can correctly score pruning solutions from the 2021 season. • Multiple solutions are considered and no assumption of a single perfect solution is made. In our prior work we showed that graph neural networks (GNNs) can be trained to generate pruning solutions that could direct robotic pruning robots to perform automated cane pruning of wine grape vines. That study introduced the feasibility of the technology but also showed that there were many open questions and issues with the research results that needed to be addressed. In this study we address some of these questions. For example, we answer the question of how would a model like this perform on real vine architectures compared with pruning solutions from real experienced pruners. Our most notable contributions include moving away from a per-cane classification model that attempts to define a single perfect pruning solution, to a model that ranks multiple good solutions and picks the best one. We addressed a key limitation of the previous training data by moving away from synthetic vine architectures to realistic ones recorded from real vines and using pruning solutions collected by expert pruners as our ground-truth. Our primary goal was to show that learning by example using a GNN-based model was a viable approach to automated pruning, even when compared with experienced pruners. We showed robust performance from our model by training on a dataset of 90 pruning solutions generated by expert pruners in the 2022 season, and testing our performance on 117 pruning solutions from an independent set of pruners from the 2021 season. The model was able to correctly score all the pruning solutions from the 2021 dataset as good to very good and none of the expert solutions were classified as poor .

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Systems with Applications
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129778
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generating realistic pruning solutions for automated grape vine pruning using graph neural networks

1 citations
Expert Systems with Applications
Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
2.31
article

Generating realistic pruning solutions for automated grape vine pruning using graph neural networks

article en
1 citations

Abstract

• A pruning algorithm is presented that takes vine architecture into account and learns by example. • Key limitations from prior work have been addressed. • Models trained on 2022 season data can correctly score pruning solutions from the 2021 season. • Multiple solutions are considered and no assumption of a single perfect solution is made. In our prior work we showed that graph neural networks (GNNs) can be trained to generate pruning solutions that could direct robotic pruning robots to perform automated cane pruning of wine grape vines. That study introduced the feasibility of the technology but also showed that there were many open questions and issues with the research results that needed to be addressed. In this study we address some of these questions. For example, we answer the question of how would a model like this perform on real vine architectures compared with pruning solutions from real experienced pruners. Our most notable contributions include moving away from a per-cane classification model that attempts to define a single perfect pruning solution, to a model that ranks multiple good solutions and picks the best one. We addressed a key limitation of the previous training data by moving away from synthetic vine architectures to realistic ones recorded from real vines and using pruning solutions collected by expert pruners as our ground-truth. Our primary goal was to show that learning by example using a GNN-based model was a viable approach to automated pruning, even when compared with experienced pruners. We showed robust performance from our model by training on a dataset of 90 pruning solutions generated by expert pruners in the 2022 season, and testing our performance on 117 pruning solutions from an independent set of pruners from the 2021 season. The model was able to correctly score all the pruning solutions from the 2021 dataset as good to very good and none of the expert solutions were classified as poor .

Expert Systems with ApplicationsVol. 298
University of Auckland (NZ), University of Canterbury (NZ), Lincoln Agritech (New Zealand) (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generating realistic pruning solutions for automated grape vine pruning using graph neural networks · Expert Systems with Applications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS