(Counter)productive hope: Scrutinising the role of hope in sustainability

Today, we witness a constant search for hope amidst global struggles. In the face of uncertainty and unpredictability, hope appears as a vehicle for building a better tomorrow. Especially in the context of global sustainability discussions, hope has been appealing; it has been seen as a forward-taking and action-generating force. Hope has also gained increasing interest in social scientific scholarship aiming to understand our sustainability challenges and the future of humanity, among other questions. Drawing on the scholarly discussions, this paper critically probes the links between sustainability and hope. It asks, to what extent can the cultivation of hope, aimed at building sustainable futures, be counterproductive? By focusing on two aspects of hope, namely temporality and (in)action, the paper brings forth the multifaceted nature of hope. This equivocality characterises hope and, as such, makes it utilisable for various ends. Hope, per se , can turn out to be harmful by preventing transformation or by bypassing the present sustainability concerns. • Hope should not be perceived only as forward-taking and empowering. • Hope’s future gaze can work to bypass present concerns. • Hope enables inaction and the evasion of responsibility in sustainability issues. • Hope is always multifaceted and facilitates use and abuse.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Futures
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103706
Primary Topic
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Counter)productive hope: Scrutinising the role of hope in sustainability

Futures
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
article

(Counter)productive hope: Scrutinising the role of hope in sustainability

article en

Abstract

Today, we witness a constant search for hope amidst global struggles. In the face of uncertainty and unpredictability, hope appears as a vehicle for building a better tomorrow. Especially in the context of global sustainability discussions, hope has been appealing; it has been seen as a forward-taking and action-generating force. Hope has also gained increasing interest in social scientific scholarship aiming to understand our sustainability challenges and the future of humanity, among other questions. Drawing on the scholarly discussions, this paper critically probes the links between sustainability and hope. It asks, to what extent can the cultivation of hope, aimed at building sustainable futures, be counterproductive? By focusing on two aspects of hope, namely temporality and (in)action, the paper brings forth the multifaceted nature of hope. This equivocality characterises hope and, as such, makes it utilisable for various ends. Hope, per se , can turn out to be harmful by preventing transformation or by bypassing the present sustainability concerns. • Hope should not be perceived only as forward-taking and empowering. • Hope’s future gaze can work to bypass present concerns. • Hope enables inaction and the evasion of responsibility in sustainability issues. • Hope is always multifaceted and facilitates use and abuse.

FuturesVol. 174
Gender Studies (CZ), University of Lapland (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

(Counter)productive hope: Scrutinising the role of hope in sustainability · Futures (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS