Ouroboran Universe and Nature of Time

Comprehending time’s fundamental nature exposes a foundational dissonance within modern physics. This arises from the seemingly incommensurable descriptions provided by its two most successful, yet distinct, theoretical pillars: General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. These frameworks, individually powerful within their domains, employ different languages, assumptions, and conceptualizations of reality, creating a schism that has persisted for decades. A coherent synthesis to address “What is time?” necessitates confronting this dissonance, recognizing it not as an irreconcilable conflict, but as a crucial set of clues pointing toward a deeper, unified, underlying structure where both views hold validity from their limited perspectives. This enduring tension is rooted in a fundamental category error: the mistaken reification of epistemic models, or “maps,” for the ontological reality, or “territory,” itself.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17195840
Primary Topic
Archaeological Research and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ouroboran Universe and Nature of Time

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Archaeological Research and Protection
article

Ouroboran Universe and Nature of Time

article en

Abstract

Comprehending time’s fundamental nature exposes a foundational dissonance within modern physics. This arises from the seemingly incommensurable descriptions provided by its two most successful, yet distinct, theoretical pillars: General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. These frameworks, individually powerful within their domains, employ different languages, assumptions, and conceptualizations of reality, creating a schism that has persisted for decades. A coherent synthesis to address “What is time?” necessitates confronting this dissonance, recognizing it not as an irreconcilable conflict, but as a crucial set of clues pointing toward a deeper, unified, underlying structure where both views hold validity from their limited perspectives. This enduring tension is rooted in a fundamental category error: the mistaken reification of epistemic models, or “maps,” for the ontological reality, or “territory,” itself.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Q-Flex (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Archaeological Research and Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.