Work volition: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research

In this article, we undertake a systematic review of empirical research on work volition, defined as the capacity of an individual to make occupational choices despite facing constraints. In doing so we not only expose emerging theoretical perspectives that have been used to study work volition, but also analyse assumptions in the literature and clarify the construct of work volition. Based on the gaps and inconsistencies identified in our review, we develop an agenda for future research that highlights the advantages of adopting social cognitive approaches to study work volition, articulates new empirical directions for research, and identifies improved methodologies for studying work volition. In particular, we call on scholars to examine personal and contextual factors that promote work volition, and support individuals to overcome the constraints faced in their work and personal lives, as well as the mechanisms that explain why those high in work volition are able to overcome constraints and look at a wider range of outcomes associated with work volition.

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Management Review
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2025.101118
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work volition: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research

Human Resource Management Review
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

Work volition: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research

article en

Abstract

In this article, we undertake a systematic review of empirical research on work volition, defined as the capacity of an individual to make occupational choices despite facing constraints. In doing so we not only expose emerging theoretical perspectives that have been used to study work volition, but also analyse assumptions in the literature and clarify the construct of work volition. Based on the gaps and inconsistencies identified in our review, we develop an agenda for future research that highlights the advantages of adopting social cognitive approaches to study work volition, articulates new empirical directions for research, and identifies improved methodologies for studying work volition. In particular, we call on scholars to examine personal and contextual factors that promote work volition, and support individuals to overcome the constraints faced in their work and personal lives, as well as the mechanisms that explain why those high in work volition are able to overcome constraints and look at a wider range of outcomes associated with work volition.

Human Resource Management ReviewVol. 36(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Work volition: A systematic review of the literature and agenda for future research · Human Resource Management Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS