Emergence of Physics and Quantum Mechanics from Statistical and Information-Theoretic Principles

Modern physics seeks to understand the fundamental nature of physical reality and the emergence of its complex structures from first principles. This quest must begin with a rigorous deconstruction of the concept of “laws of nature.” For centuries, physics and philosophy have operated under the assumption that the universe is governed by immutable, objective, and metaphysically robust laws that prescribe the behavior of matter and energy. This concept, however, proves to be an inadequate and ultimately untenable foundation upon which to build a coherent picture of the cosmos. A thorough critique reveals that every major attempt to give a precise, defensible account of what a law of nature is founders on insurmountable logical and philosophical problems. This failure signals that the notion of prescriptive laws is a relic of a pre-scientific, theological worldview, ill-suited to the landscape of modern physics. The necessary conclusion is a shift beyond the search for governing edicts toward a new foundation based not on what reality must do, but on what it can be, as described by the more fundamental principles of symmetry and structural constraint.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17204356
Primary Topic
Legal Cases and Commentary
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emergence of Physics and Quantum Mechanics from Statistical and Information-Theoretic Principles

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Legal Cases and Commentary
article

Emergence of Physics and Quantum Mechanics from Statistical and Information-Theoretic Principles

article en

Abstract

Modern physics seeks to understand the fundamental nature of physical reality and the emergence of its complex structures from first principles. This quest must begin with a rigorous deconstruction of the concept of “laws of nature.” For centuries, physics and philosophy have operated under the assumption that the universe is governed by immutable, objective, and metaphysically robust laws that prescribe the behavior of matter and energy. This concept, however, proves to be an inadequate and ultimately untenable foundation upon which to build a coherent picture of the cosmos. A thorough critique reveals that every major attempt to give a precise, defensible account of what a law of nature is founders on insurmountable logical and philosophical problems. This failure signals that the notion of prescriptive laws is a relic of a pre-scientific, theological worldview, ill-suited to the landscape of modern physics. The necessary conclusion is a shift beyond the search for governing edicts toward a new foundation based not on what reality must do, but on what it can be, as described by the more fundamental principles of symmetry and structural constraint.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Q-Flex (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Legal Cases and Commentary
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.