Systemic risk and macroeconomic activity: International evidence

In this paper, we propose an easily implementable combination forecast method to examine whether systemic risk can predict macroeconomic activity. Our method uses various weighting schemes to combine common individual systemic risk measures. Empirical results demonstrate that our novel forecasting strategy provides better and more stable out-of-sample performance than a set of established methods. Furthermore, the forecast combination puzzle identified by Stock and Watson (2004) is also present in systemic risk. Our findings further reveal that institution-specific risk measures, such as and , consistently provide reliable information to inform predictions of future macroeconomic downturns across most regions. The strength and direction of those asymmetric relationships are closely associated with the risk levels (i.e., quantiles of independent variables) of systemic risk indicators. • We propose a novel forecast combination with three types of combining weights. • The forecast combination puzzle presents in the systemic risk. • This paper exploits the heterogeneity in developed and developing economies. • The strength and direction of the asymmetric relationships closely associate with the risk-levels of systemic risk indicators.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management Science and Engineering
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2025.09.001
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemic risk and macroeconomic activity: International evidence

1 citations
Journal of Management Science and Engineering
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
article

Systemic risk and macroeconomic activity: International evidence

article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an easily implementable combination forecast method to examine whether systemic risk can predict macroeconomic activity. Our method uses various weighting schemes to combine common individual systemic risk measures. Empirical results demonstrate that our novel forecasting strategy provides better and more stable out-of-sample performance than a set of established methods. Furthermore, the forecast combination puzzle identified by Stock and Watson (2004) is also present in systemic risk. Our findings further reveal that institution-specific risk measures, such as and , consistently provide reliable information to inform predictions of future macroeconomic downturns across most regions. The strength and direction of those asymmetric relationships are closely associated with the risk levels (i.e., quantiles of independent variables) of systemic risk indicators. • We propose a novel forecast combination with three types of combining weights. • The forecast combination puzzle presents in the systemic risk. • This paper exploits the heterogeneity in developed and developing economies. • The strength and direction of the asymmetric relationships closely associate with the risk-levels of systemic risk indicators.

Journal of Management Science and EngineeringVol. 10(4)
Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.