Is Germany experiencing urban or suburban growth? Contrasting long-standing and novel urban gradient classifications

Understanding population shifts along urban-rural gradients is crucial for informed decision-making in sustainable spatial planning. Empirical accounts of urbanization and suburbanization rely on classification choices, typically derived from administrative units. Recently, novel classification approaches based on remote sensing and high-resolution population data have gained relevance. This trend, driven by methodological advancements, raises the question of whether these new approaches yield similar or different results in comparative analyses along urban-rural gradients. Our paper explores how classification choices affect assessments of population trends along the urban-rural gradient at both the national and subnational regional scales. We contrast three urban gradient classifications to analyze population change in 50 German metropolitan regions from 2011 to 2022. Results indicate that, at the national scale, observed trends in urban, suburban, and peri-urban areas are consistent across all classifications. For Germany, we find that urban areas have registered higher growth rates than suburban and peri-urban areas across all classifications. However, at the regional scale, observed trends partially depend on classification choices, suggesting that regional findings are particularly sensitive to the chosen classification scheme. The methodological framework presented here can also be applied to other geographical contexts for which similar data are available. • Examines how classification choices affect observed population change along urban–rural gradients. • Compares functional (long-standing) with gridded population and morphology-based (novel) urban classifications. • Analyzes 50 German metro regions for 2011–2022 relative population changes. • At the national scale, urban, suburban, and peri-urban change patterns are stable across classifications. • The morphology-based approach shows higher population growth in urban cores on average.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Geography
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103779
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Germany experiencing urban or suburban growth? Contrasting long-standing and novel urban gradient classifications

Applied Geography
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Is Germany experiencing urban or suburban growth? Contrasting long-standing and novel urban gradient classifications

article en

Abstract

Understanding population shifts along urban-rural gradients is crucial for informed decision-making in sustainable spatial planning. Empirical accounts of urbanization and suburbanization rely on classification choices, typically derived from administrative units. Recently, novel classification approaches based on remote sensing and high-resolution population data have gained relevance. This trend, driven by methodological advancements, raises the question of whether these new approaches yield similar or different results in comparative analyses along urban-rural gradients. Our paper explores how classification choices affect assessments of population trends along the urban-rural gradient at both the national and subnational regional scales. We contrast three urban gradient classifications to analyze population change in 50 German metropolitan regions from 2011 to 2022. Results indicate that, at the national scale, observed trends in urban, suburban, and peri-urban areas are consistent across all classifications. For Germany, we find that urban areas have registered higher growth rates than suburban and peri-urban areas across all classifications. However, at the regional scale, observed trends partially depend on classification choices, suggesting that regional findings are particularly sensitive to the chosen classification scheme. The methodological framework presented here can also be applied to other geographical contexts for which similar data are available. • Examines how classification choices affect observed population change along urban–rural gradients. • Compares functional (long-standing) with gridded population and morphology-based (novel) urban classifications. • Analyzes 50 German metro regions for 2011–2022 relative population changes. • At the national scale, urban, suburban, and peri-urban change patterns are stable across classifications. • The morphology-based approach shows higher population growth in urban cores on average.

Applied GeographyVol. 185
TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Leeds (GB), University of Cologne (DE), Vytautas Magnus University (LT), University of Würzburg (DE), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Federal Institute for Population Research (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.