Comparative effects of Fe2O3, CuO, TiO2 and CaO on the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of fabricated glasses

This study presents the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of the metal oxides (Fe 2 O 3 , CuO, TiO 2 , and CaO) on 10Na 2 O–20PbO–60B 2 O 3 –10MO glasses. The first half of the study introduced mechanical parameters from the Makishima–Mackenzie model meaning the hardness increased to 5.0 GPa due to TiO 2 , while the flexibility increased (σ = 0.264) because of the Fe 2 O 3 oxide. The radiation shielding portion of the study quantified the values of the lead-based 10Na 2 O–20PbO–60B 2 O 3 –10MO glasses containing the metal oxides. Radiation shielding investigations, using a NaI(Tl) detector, have shown that the linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) dropped by approximately 60% with the increase of photon energy from 0.511 to 1.332 MeV. The energy-dependent trend demonstrated that CuO-doped glasses yielded the highest LAC at 0.511 MeV (0.42±0.09 cm -1 ) while Fe 2 O 3 -doped glasses had the highest LAC at the higher energies with LAC's of 0.297 and 0.203±0.03 cm -1 at 0.662 and 1.332 MeV respectively. The half-value layer varied from ∼1.6 cm at 0.511 MeV to ∼3.8 cm at 1.332 MeV, depending on the dopant. These outcomes indicated that Fe 2 O 3 and CuO were shown to be the best oxides which both improved mechanical hardness and γ-ray attenuation, and which may be considered suitable for advanced radiation shielding applications. • Transition-metal oxides can affect both mechanical and radiation shielding. • TiO 2 doping improves hardness to 0.886 GPa. • LAC dropped by 60% with the increase of photon energy from 0.511 to 1.332 MeV. • CuO improved low energy γ-ray shielding efficiency from 0.356 - 0.511 MeV.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Science Advanced Materials and Devices
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2025.101006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effects of Fe2O3, CuO, TiO2 and CaO on the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of fabricated glasses

1 citations
Journal of Science Advanced Materials and Devices
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
article

Comparative effects of Fe2O3, CuO, TiO2 and CaO on the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of fabricated glasses

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study presents the mechanical and radiation shielding properties of the metal oxides (Fe 2 O 3 , CuO, TiO 2 , and CaO) on 10Na 2 O–20PbO–60B 2 O 3 –10MO glasses. The first half of the study introduced mechanical parameters from the Makishima–Mackenzie model meaning the hardness increased to 5.0 GPa due to TiO 2 , while the flexibility increased (σ = 0.264) because of the Fe 2 O 3 oxide. The radiation shielding portion of the study quantified the values of the lead-based 10Na 2 O–20PbO–60B 2 O 3 –10MO glasses containing the metal oxides. Radiation shielding investigations, using a NaI(Tl) detector, have shown that the linear attenuation coefficient (LAC) dropped by approximately 60% with the increase of photon energy from 0.511 to 1.332 MeV. The energy-dependent trend demonstrated that CuO-doped glasses yielded the highest LAC at 0.511 MeV (0.42±0.09 cm -1 ) while Fe 2 O 3 -doped glasses had the highest LAC at the higher energies with LAC's of 0.297 and 0.203±0.03 cm -1 at 0.662 and 1.332 MeV respectively. The half-value layer varied from ∼1.6 cm at 0.511 MeV to ∼3.8 cm at 1.332 MeV, depending on the dopant. These outcomes indicated that Fe 2 O 3 and CuO were shown to be the best oxides which both improved mechanical hardness and γ-ray attenuation, and which may be considered suitable for advanced radiation shielding applications. • Transition-metal oxides can affect both mechanical and radiation shielding. • TiO 2 doping improves hardness to 0.886 GPa. • LAC dropped by 60% with the increase of photon energy from 0.511 to 1.332 MeV. • CuO improved low energy γ-ray shielding efficiency from 0.356 - 0.511 MeV.

Journal of Science Advanced Materials and DevicesVol. 10(4)
Doğuş University (TR), Ural Federal University (RU), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN), Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), Western Caspian University (AZ), Nuclear Materials Authority (EG), Tunis El Manar University (TN), University of Tabuk (SA), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA), Isra University (JO)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.