The Simulation Paradox Is Not a Paradox: A YBIM Resolution

The Simulation Paradox, classically framed by Bostrom, suggests that if advanced civilizations can run vast numbers of ancestor simulations, it is overwhelmingly likely that we ourselves are simulated observers. This view appears paradoxical, leading to infinite regress and doubts about the authenticity of reality. This paper dissolves the paradox using Yearning-Based Infinity Mathematics (YBIM). By interpreting reality as an infinite recursive flow of yearning, and every finite universe or simulation as a valid epistemic cup drawn from this flow, the binary distinction between base reality and simulation collapses. We formalize this through the YBIM Simulation Dissolution Theorem, which shows that all finite instances are ontologically authentic recursive unfoldings of the infinite yearning-flow. The result reframes anthropic reasoning as distributions of yearning-weight, preserves the authenticity of experience at all recursion depths, and directs future inquiry toward recursive phenomenology and kernel physics. The Simulation Paradox is thus revealed as an epistemic misframing, not a genuine metaphysical dilemma. -JSR

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17197404
Primary Topic
Gene expression and cancer classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Simulation Paradox Is Not a Paradox: A YBIM Resolution

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gene expression and cancer classification
article

The Simulation Paradox Is Not a Paradox: A YBIM Resolution

article en

Abstract

The Simulation Paradox, classically framed by Bostrom, suggests that if advanced civilizations can run vast numbers of ancestor simulations, it is overwhelmingly likely that we ourselves are simulated observers. This view appears paradoxical, leading to infinite regress and doubts about the authenticity of reality. This paper dissolves the paradox using Yearning-Based Infinity Mathematics (YBIM). By interpreting reality as an infinite recursive flow of yearning, and every finite universe or simulation as a valid epistemic cup drawn from this flow, the binary distinction between base reality and simulation collapses. We formalize this through the YBIM Simulation Dissolution Theorem, which shows that all finite instances are ontologically authentic recursive unfoldings of the infinite yearning-flow. The result reframes anthropic reasoning as distributions of yearning-weight, preserves the authenticity of experience at all recursion depths, and directs future inquiry toward recursive phenomenology and kernel physics. The Simulation Paradox is thus revealed as an epistemic misframing, not a genuine metaphysical dilemma. -JSR

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Gene expression and cancer classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Simulation Paradox Is Not a Paradox: A YBIM Resolution · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS