Karl Rahner und das Judentum. Updates zu „einem schwierigen Verhältnis“

Abstract Grümme (1997) in particular has criticised Karl Rahner’s relationship to Judaism. Based on Rahner’s Sämtliche Werke , this criticism is re-examined here and placed in the wider context of his work. The article concludes that the previous theses on the dominance of the New Testament over the OT, on the Christocentric doctrine of grace, etc., largely hold up. What is new is the explicit clarification that Rahner was not a racist anti-Semite. This is evident both biographically and in his statements after Auschwitz. His theological position on Judaism is based on (Christocentric) lines of tradition, which he never completely escaped throughout his life. He functionalised Judaism by means of illustrative anti-Judaism as a comparative salvation factor to Christianity. There is hardly any explicit engagement with Judaism. It is therefore not possible for Karl Rahner to develop an independent theology of Israel („Israeltheologie“). His position is relevant to the history of research and can contribute in future scholarship as a point of reference in Rahner research, in the Catholic approach to Judaism and to the historical reappraisal of (everyday) Christian Jew-Hatred resp. theological antisemitism.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/znth-2025-2005
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Karl Rahner und das Judentum. Updates zu „einem schwierigen Verhältnis“

Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere Theologiegeschichte
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Karl Rahner und das Judentum. Updates zu „einem schwierigen Verhältnis“

article en

Abstract

Abstract Grümme (1997) in particular has criticised Karl Rahner’s relationship to Judaism. Based on Rahner’s Sämtliche Werke , this criticism is re-examined here and placed in the wider context of his work. The article concludes that the previous theses on the dominance of the New Testament over the OT, on the Christocentric doctrine of grace, etc., largely hold up. What is new is the explicit clarification that Rahner was not a racist anti-Semite. This is evident both biographically and in his statements after Auschwitz. His theological position on Judaism is based on (Christocentric) lines of tradition, which he never completely escaped throughout his life. He functionalised Judaism by means of illustrative anti-Judaism as a comparative salvation factor to Christianity. There is hardly any explicit engagement with Judaism. It is therefore not possible for Karl Rahner to develop an independent theology of Israel („Israeltheologie“). His position is relevant to the history of research and can contribute in future scholarship as a point of reference in Rahner research, in the Catholic approach to Judaism and to the historical reappraisal of (everyday) Christian Jew-Hatred resp. theological antisemitism.

Journal for the History of Modern Theology / Zeitschrift für Neuere TheologiegeschichteVol. 32(1)
University of Passau (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.