Applicability of machine learning approaches for predicting the phase formation in complex concentrated alloys

This work deals with the machine learning techniques used to build predictive models to determine the phases in complex concentrated alloys (CCAs). Two different approaches were employed to determine the presence of phases. The one that relies on thermodynamic parameters was insight invoking majorly, and the other helped to predict phases for the specified alloy composition. Predictions were made using ensemble models and neural networks. Five machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied that are (1) K-nearest neighbors (KNN), (2) Support vector machines (SVM), (3) Gradient Boosting, (4) Ada-Boost Classifier, and (5) Histogram gradient Boosting Classifier. These algorithms were utilized for the prediction of Solid Solution (SS) and Intermetallic (IM) phases in CCAs. Among all the models, the Histogram Gradient Boosting Classifier model and Gradient Boosting model demonstrated the highest accuracies of 85.0 % and 83.7 %, respectively, for phase prediction with thermodynamic parameters. For phase prediction considering the alloy composition, the Histogram Gradient Boosting Classifier model obtained an accuracy of 84.8 %, while the Gradient Boosting model resulted an accuracy of 82.3 %. It was deduced that Histogram Gradient Boosting Classifier is the most significant model with respect to phase predictions in CCAs. • Thermodynamic parameters and composotion based approaches for predicting phase fromation is CCAs. • Esemble models and neaural networks employing five ML algorithms were applied. • Solid Solution BCC, Solid Solution FCC, Solid Solution (BCC+FCC) and Intermetallic (IM) phases were considered. • Histogram Gradient Boosting Classifier is the most significant model with respect to phase predictions in CCAs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Materials
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.101248
Primary Topic
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applicability of machine learning approaches for predicting the phase formation in complex concentrated alloys

Next Materials
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
article

Applicability of machine learning approaches for predicting the phase formation in complex concentrated alloys

article en

Abstract

This work deals with the machine learning techniques used to build predictive models to determine the phases in complex concentrated alloys (CCAs). Two different approaches were employed to determine the presence of phases. The one that relies on thermodynamic parameters was insight invoking majorly, and the other helped to predict phases for the specified alloy composition. Predictions were made using ensemble models and neural networks. Five machine learning (ML) algorithms were applied that are (1) K-nearest neighbors (KNN), (2) Support vector machines (SVM), (3) Gradient Boosting, (4) Ada-Boost Classifier, and (5) Histogram gradient Boosting Classifier. These algorithms were utilized for the prediction of Solid Solution (SS) and Intermetallic (IM) phases in CCAs. Among all the models, the Histogram Gradient Boosting Classifier model and Gradient Boosting model demonstrated the highest accuracies of 85.0 % and 83.7 %, respectively, for phase prediction with thermodynamic parameters. For phase prediction considering the alloy composition, the Histogram Gradient Boosting Classifier model obtained an accuracy of 84.8 %, while the Gradient Boosting model resulted an accuracy of 82.3 %. It was deduced that Histogram Gradient Boosting Classifier is the most significant model with respect to phase predictions in CCAs. • Thermodynamic parameters and composotion based approaches for predicting phase fromation is CCAs. • Esemble models and neaural networks employing five ML algorithms were applied. • Solid Solution BCC, Solid Solution FCC, Solid Solution (BCC+FCC) and Intermetallic (IM) phases were considered. • Histogram Gradient Boosting Classifier is the most significant model with respect to phase predictions in CCAs.

Next MaterialsVol. 9
Indian Institute of Technology BHU (IN), Banaras Hindu University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.